Talk:Spanish Eyes (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Suggested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved, base-name dab has been expanded, no indication that the film is primary. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Eyes (film) → Spanish Eyes – Only two meanings at dab and one isn't named "Spanish Eyes"--hatnotes are made for this. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. In fact the DAB page Spanish Eyes now has three entries, since I added one just now: for a Madonna song, to which Spanish Eyes (song) was a redirect. I propose the following arrangement instead:

Spanish Eyes [DAB page, as at present]
Spanish Eyes (film) [As at present]
Spanish Eyes (song) [redirect to the DAB page Spanish Eyes]

This alternative seems to meet all needs of all enquirers, and it would be a hindrance to no one.

☺

Noetica^Tea? 07:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. With only two other links and neither them having articles with Spanish Eyes in the title, there can easily be a hatnote like the nominator suggested. JDDJS (talk) 18:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JDDJS, how does that evidence work in favour of a change from the present arrangement, under which there is pretty good precision and no one's interests are neglected in favour of sheer unexplained rule-following? How is my suggestion (which you have chosen to ignore) not even better than the present arrangement? Surely if everything specific is labelled specifically, and if what is uncertain is clearly dealt with to assist those who are not sure what to look for or where to look for it, everyone is better off, right? If not, why not?
¿♫♪? Noetica^Tea? 00:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Although "Moon Over Naples" does not have "Spanish Eyes" in the article title, the song is most notable under that title as the article points out. It was a #15 pop/#1 AC hit for Al Martino under that title and has become a standard under that title since. I argue that this is probably the single most notable meaning of "Spanish Eyes" (although maybe not the primary topic). I support User:Noetica's proposal instead. — AjaxSmack 01:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my accidental deletion of that comment, AS, which you have now fixed. Noetica^Tea? 01:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The song should be primary. The movie is pretty obscure. The article for the song got 3,700 page views in the last 90 days, the one for the movie got 272. Kauffner (talk) 07:20, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Recently, Spanish Eyes (song) is a redirect to the dab page. I have created both Spanish Eyes (Madonna song) and Spanish Eyes (1966 song). Moreover, why defaulting the name to the obscure film itself? --George Ho (talk) 04:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
oppose a disambiguation page should exist at the simple name. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 05:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.