Talk:Spacetime topology

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Causal structure#Causal structure|chronological past and future]] Anchor Causal structure#Causal structure links to a specific web page: Causal Structure. The anchor (#Causal structure) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Stub

I've created this stub which, hopefully, will expand into a fairly comprehensive article. MP ^{(talk•contribs)} 20:47, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plural ?

I suggest renaming this article to “spacetime topologies”, because there is at least two (generally even three) topologies. Any objections? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the current title is sufficient; otherwise we'd have to rename the Topology article 'Topologies' and Topological space to 'Topological spaces' and so on. I know this article is more specific, but the article explains the different topologies. :) MP ^{(talk•contribs)} 09:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

R4

I suppose that in this sentence:

As with any manifold, a spacetime possesses a natural manifold topology. Here the open sets are the image of open sets in

\mathbb {R} ^{n}

.

what is meant is: $\mathbb {R} ^{4}$ .

Or am I missing something?

--David Olivier (talk) 09:14, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematically, the sets that are declared to be open in the manifold come with the definition of manifold, not as images of anything. Nevertheless, since charts to R4 (or Rn if one want to be general) are required to be continuous, the inverse image of open sets of R4 should be open sets of the manifold.Noix07 (talk) 13:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How many topologies?

The article says "There are two main types of topology..." and then goes on to describe three. Is this a typo or have I misunderstood? -- Dr Greg talk 15:43, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is even more confusion than this confusion. If I understand correctly, the interval topology (

I^{+}(x)\cap I^{-}(y)

) is the same as the path topology for any globally hyperbolic manifold (i.e. for any cosmology except pathological theories like Gödel metric). In a manifold with a closed time-like curve the interval topology will be coarser, likely even trivial. But the article actually mentions two topologies under the name "Alexandrov topology": the interval topology (Hausdorf) and the

I^{+}(x)

topology (a coarser, non-Hausdorf). Apparently (an original research starts here), there is also a non-Hausdorf version of the path topology. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:11, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I checked out the definition of interval topology, and the Alexandrov topology here seems not to be exactly the interval topology: here one defines open subsets whereas in the interval topology one defines closed subsets. I asked the question at http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1182966/subbase-for-a-topology-defined-by-a-family-of-closed-sets Noix07 (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]