Talk:Space Bound/GA2
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Retrohead (talk · contribs) 17:30, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- References
- References 10 & 11 need formatting. I see that these are Twitter posts, thus making them unreliable.
- Other refs I consider unreliable for GA: 19 and 21 (Gigwise and InMusic).
- Media
- The synopsis image is legitimately updated and contains proper use rationale.
- I think an audio sample would serve well here, since we're discussing a specific song.
- Prose
- The introduction should summarize the entire article. Exclude all references from here, and introduce information about the song's background and development, as well as a bit more about the controversy.
- pornographic actress should be de-linked.
- The 'Development' section seems not fully researched. How about adding information regarding the inspiration or interesting facts about its writing/recording?
- Same for 'Composition and reception'. GA song must feature a detailed analysis about the musical structure and lyrics, which can be obtained from the album reviews.
- The video section seems the most organized part. It has all the necessary features, so no complaints here.
- The tables are also properly formatted and referenced.
- Generally speaking, I'm little skeptical about the articles chances of reaching the good article status. A lot of work needs to be done here, but I'll give you a try.--Retrohead (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- I noticed that the nominator is unavailable to complete the notes, so I'll close the nomination. There was awful amount of work that needs to be done here, and I don't think it can be sorted out in near future.--Retrohead (talk) 09:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- I received a message that the nomination has failed even though i'm ready to improve the article it was not me who nominated it. Someone else might have done it using my account. I am not aware of it. Abhinav0908 (talk) 11:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Abhinav0908, I can re-review it for you when the article is improved. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 14:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- I received a message that the nomination has failed even though i'm ready to improve the article it was not me who nominated it. Someone else might have done it using my account. I am not aware of it. Abhinav0908 (talk) 11:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)