Talk:Southern Pacific 2472

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains: Locomotives Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Um, the text on this page appears to be a lift, almost word for word from: http://www.ggrm.org/about_the_museum/steams/southernpacific.htm

That's probably not good. Note that the GGRM got its start beacuse of this loco so some sort of article probably makes sense and there is info elsewhere on the site that might be good to incorporate as well. I haven't put {{copyvio}} on the article in hopes someone maybe can fix it up. ++Lar: t/c 06:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I've done a quick and dirty rewrite which lost most of the content... alas, what are ya gonna do? It was a copyvio, plain and simple. I found this via newpages, trains are not something I know a lot about. --W.marsh 07:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I am a train guy so I'll see what I can do. Steam is not my thing, I prefer modern diesels and intermodal gear, but this is a loco with some historic significance... I probably should have just slashed it myself, but I have a tendency to check for consensus... maybe more than is congruent with WP:BOLD... ++Lar: t/c 14:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio got reinserted

I reverted it and left a message on the user's talk page. ++Lar: t/c 23:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~:and reinserted again. I took it to WP:ANI for advice, where it was suggested it be reverted again. ++Lar: t/c 00:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

no, this time it's not word for word (although clearly from the same text, it has been rewritten). So I reverted my revert to put it back. ++Lar: t/c 00:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]