Talk:Southern Launch
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Some proposed changes
[edit]I am the media manager for Southern Launch and have some proposed changes to reflect the progress the company has made. This will ensure the information is up-to-date.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
− | + | 2=The Whalers Way Orbital Launch Complex is located 45 kilometres (28 miles) south of the South Australian regional city of Port Lincoln at the southern tip of Eyre Peninsula. |
- Reason for the change: This is additional information not relevant to the position of the facility without supporting references.
- References supporting change: https://www.southernlaunch.space/whalers-way-orbital-launch-complex
Morrissey230 (talk) 02:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Proposed changes to activities
[edit]I am the Media Manager for Southern Launch and have some proposed changes to reflect recent achievements by the company.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
− | + | Launches
In 2022 Southern Launch worked with customer ATSpace to conduct two launch campaigns from the Whalers Way Orbital Launch Complex. The first campaign in November 2022 ended after a severe storm lashed the area and caused an electrical fault in the launch vehicle.
The second campaign in December 2022 attempted to launch the VS02 and VS03 missions. Both missions were aborted during the countdown due to a leak during the fuelling process in the ATSpace launch vehicle.
In August 2022 Southern Launch conducted a campaign for customer T-Minus Engineering from the Koonibba Test Range. The mission patch was designed by local Aboriginal artist, Kevina Ware.
In October 2019, Southern Launch signed an agreement with Perigee Aerospace of South Korea to use the Southern Launch rocket facilities from 2020. To date, this launch has not taken place due to delays in the manufacturing process.
In February 2020, the company signed a launch service provider contract with DEWC Systems to be the first company to launch a payload aboard a sub-orbital rocket at the Koonibba Test Range. The launch occurred on 19 September 2020. |
Reason for the change: The information was outdated and didn't reflect recent achievements.
References supporting change: https://www.aumanufacturing.com.au/weekend-lightning-damages-rocket-postponing-whalers-way-launch https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-16/sa-southern-launch-whalers-way-rocket-postponed/101777794 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-21/south-australian-atspace-southern-launch-fail-whalers-way-obital/101797402 https://spacewatch.global/2022/08/local-aboriginal-artist-designs-southern-launchs-upcoming-rocket-launch-mission-patch/
Morrissey230 (talk) 02:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Morrissey230,
- Do all 5 refs refer to all the new material? If not, please explain which ones are relevant to which text.
- What is a "launch campaign" as distinct from a launch? Can you suggest an alternative to "campaign"?
- It would be good to illustrate the article. I can arrange that if you can supply a photo that the copyright owner is willing to make available under the provisions of Creative Commons licence BY 4.0 or BY-SA 4.0 (see https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/). I would prepare a licence for you.
- I notice you have proposed deleting, on the grounds that it does not contain a reference, "... Peninsula, an important area of coastal conservation, marine sanctuary and native vegetation protection. Pending an environmental review and comment from local residents, the company intends that customers will be able to launch their rockets into orbit over the Great Australian Bight." I have added a "Citation needed" tag for the time being. Could you bring the 2nd sentence up to date?
- PS: I recommend you create an account (see here) so that you are contactable in future. Cheers, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 03:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SCHolar44 why do ask them to create an account when Morrissey230 is their account? Lightoil (talk) 03:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- If you click on the red "Morrissey230", Lightoil, you'll see that an account hasn't yet been created (which is why it's red). :-) SCHolar44 (talk) 03:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SCHolar44 that only means that they do not have a user page. They have an account. Lightoil (talk) 03:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- If you click on the red "Morrissey230", Lightoil, you'll see that an account hasn't yet been created (which is why it's red). :-) SCHolar44 (talk) 03:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @SCHolar44
- The 4 references refer to the new material. The first three are about the Nov/Dec 2022 launch campaigns. The 4th refers to the Koonibba campaign.
- A launch campaign is when we go out on site to conduct everything required for a launch to take place. As none of the launches took place due to faults they cannot be described as a launch. Campaign is a standard word in the space industry.
- I think the best way to bring the 2nd sentence up to date is to delete the additional information as I suggested. There is no additional information I can reference to bring it up to date as approvals are going through a government process which has not been published publicly.
- Thanks
- Amy Morrissey230 (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- @SCHolar44 why do ask them to create an account when Morrissey230 is their account? Lightoil (talk) 03:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply 26-JUN-2023
[edit] Unable to review
Your edit request could not be reviewed because the request is missing two particulars:
- The citation style predominantly used by the Southern Launch article appears to be Citation Style 1. The citation style used in the edit request consists of bare URL's.[a] Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1. (See WP:CITEVAR.)
- Citation ref tags have not been placed within the requested text indicating which portions of the text the source is referencing. (See WP:INTEGRITY.)
In the collapsed section below titled Request edit examples, I have illustrated two: The first shows how the edit request was submitted; the second shows how requests should be submitted in the future.
Request edit examples
|
---|
In the example above there are three URL's provided with the claim statements, but these URL's have not been placed using Citation Style 1, which is the style predominantly used by the Southern Launch article. Additionally, ref tags have not been placed within the text at the exact positions where the information they reference resides. Using the correct style and the correct positioning of the ref tags, the WikiFormatted text should resemble the following:
In the example above the references have been formatted according to Citation Style 1, which shows the author, the source's name, date, etc. Also, the ref tags are placed in the exact location where the text which they reference resides. As Wikipedia is a volunteer project, edit requests such yours are generally expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review. |
Kindly rewrite your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example shown in the collapsed section above, and feel free to re-submit that edit request at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions about this formatting please don't hesitate to ask myself or another editor. Regards, Spintendo 03:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Notes
- ^ The use of bare URLs as references is a style which is acceptable for use in Wikipedia. However, general practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus.