Talk:South American land mammal age

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:South American land mammal age is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America Mid‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for South American land mammal age (24 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	4,741	4,741
Background	222	4,169
Paleogeographic timeline	3,947	3,947
Definitions	4,969	4,969
Cenozoic fossiliferous stratigraphic units in South America	47,785	47,785
Fossil content	45,200	45,200
See also	520	520
Notes and references	27	207,013
Notes	38	38
References	37	37
Bibliography	21	206,911
SALMA	1,266	1,266
Pebas Wetlands	2,062	2,062
Argentina	84,139	84,139
Bolivia	12,686	12,686
Brazil	11,691	11,691
Chile	21,100	21,100
Colombia	33,099	33,099
Ecuador	2,715	2,715
Paraguay	652	652
Peru	22,211	22,211
Uruguay	5,386	5,386
Venezuela	9,883	9,883
Further reading	4,744	4,744
Total	319,141	319,141

Much too long

This article is much too long (see above) and needs to be split up into separate articles.----Ehrenkater (talk) 19:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on this article and the content will be split and put under the different ages of SALMA, but first I need the complete overview finished (almost done) to not do the work multiple times. I will put a wip template at the top. Tisquesusa (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, how long do you expect this to take? Onetwothreeip (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have millions of years, but about a week. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what is going on here? This article is showing no signs of stopping and it's already the largest article on Wikipedia. Maybe the best course of action is to make all this happen over at drafts or user space and revert this article back to a reasonable level until then. Onetwothreeip (talk) 00:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You see how much work it is and how much I have done for it. What is the problem, like I said it won't be a week. The information is important enough and will be moved to the various stages as I said. Thanks for the understanding and respect for my work. Tisquesusa (talk) 00:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]