Jump to content

Talk:Sorceress of Castle Grayskull

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Poorly sourced info

[edit]

So "she is considered one of the most powerful beings on Eternia" needs citation (which just might seem to be obvious)...but "If the series had continued, it was intended in the third season, that Teela would discover that the Sorceress is her mother..." (which appears to be conjecture) doesn't need any references?

Wikipedia is great for pop culture, but I am really tired of all the misinformation, lack of credible references and just plain errors.

Shall she be a sidekick to egyptian goddess Isis in the 2002 series? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.49.131.196 (talk) 01:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zoar

[edit]

There is too much poorly sourced information available but I really believe that Zoar (He-Man) should be merged with this article as there little to differentiate it on its own and not sourced.

Dwanyewest (talk) 14:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - The distinction between Zoar and the Sorceress of Castle Grayskull is not significant enough to justify their treatment on two separate articles; the merge should take place. Neelix (talk) 18:46, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous

[edit]

"In the 2002 series, the powers of the Sorceress are altered slightly. The three principal differences include: The power to fly in human form" (etc). This doesn't tell us whether the power to fly in human form is introduced in the 2002 series or if it is abolished in the 2002 series. I think it suggests the former, but a bit more clarity would be helpful. :) 05:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.35.255 (talk)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sorceress of Castle Grayskull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]