Talk:Sora Amamiya/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bluesunnyfox (talk · contribs) 19:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently reviewing this article to see if it should be a GA. Sorry for any mistakes, this is my first time reviewing. blueskies (talk) 19:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article is very well-done, but there are a few things you should sort out.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Just want to inform you that song names do not need Japanese names or English translations. The rest follows the guidelines perfectly!
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
I couldn't get into citations 56, 57, 58, 84, 95, or 100 (can be found in the references section), so I couldn't confirm them. I didn't see Sora's name in citation 109. Check if you could access them. Also, the rest are perfectly fine.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
You *might* need to make a Discography article for Sora. This article is more than 62 kB, so this article is probably difficult to load for some people on older browsers or dial-up connections.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
I'm pretty sure you can find a non-copyrighted picture of her, but be cautious.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
This article is actually quite promising, but it does need quite a bit of improvement. It's great, and keep up the good work!

@Bluesunnyfox: While I did not nominate the article, I did help the nominator out with sourcing. Regarding the sourcing issues, refs 56, 57, 58, 84, 95, and 100 not being accessible is probably something that can (and should) be fixed with archive urls. Source 109 also does mention Amamiya when it states "次回は雨宮天さん演じる「ベルナージュ」が、美空の口を借りてついに火星滅亡の真相を語る！？来週も絶対にお見逃しにならないでくださいね！" at the end. Regarding the images, I did a search and could not find one. If you can find a creative commons image, please share. I have nothing to say regarding the discography though since I did no work on that section. Link20XX (talk) 02:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was very helpful, thank you! blueskies (talk) 18:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bluesunnyfox: I added archive urls for refs 56, 57, 58, and 100 since their links were dead. Regarding sources 84 and 95, their links seem to be working just fine (at least for me). For concerns regarding the size of the discography, I am pinging the original nominator Narutolovehinata5 for their input. Link20XX (talk) 05:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I did not add the Discography section to the article so I don't really have an opinion on if it should be split or not (for what it's worth, her discography doesn't seem too long for me). As for the free image thing, as much as I'd really love there to be an image of her in the article, getting free images of Japanese voice actors (and really Japanese media personalities in general) is hard. Agencies and other companies tend to protect the public image of their talents so much that they often prohibit photography at any events these talents appear in, even professional third-party ones. There's a reason why most of our articles on Japanese voice actors do not have a free image included. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:10, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've just added a short "Musical style and influences" section to the article. Right now it only discusses one of her singles, but if you think that it can be expanded further I'm willing to do that as well. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So far, the section seems really interesting. You really did a lot of work on this. blueskies (talk) 13:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bluesunnyfox: Thank you for the comments. Is there anything else that needs to be done with the article? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]