This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
A fact from Songs from Suicide Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new and long enough. QPQ done. Earwig detects "possible violation", but this is only because of material properly quoted within article. ALT0 is good to go. ALT1 needs a little work. Instead of piping in "Pasadena's...", it would be better for clarity if the syntax was modified to note that the suicide spot is in the city. Also, "notorious" needs to be cut per MOS:PEACOCK and MOS:LABEL. However, if the description were attributed to a source, then it could be used. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 02:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]