Talk:Someone like You (2001 film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Someone Like You film.jpg

Image:Someone Like You film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 11:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 July 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per MOS:CT. Capital "Like" would be the verb. COMMONNAME only addresses the name itself, not how the name is stylized. — kwami (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure)

Someone Like You (film) → Someone like You (film) – Per WP:NCCAPS, the preposition like should be lowercased. Of course, not all likes (as a preposition) are lowercased in titles. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 17:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose current proposal. I could possibly see moving to Someone like you (film) based on some of the DVD covers. But it's "Someone Like You" at IMDb, etc. so it should either stay there, or go to Someone like you (film). --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not lowercase "You". George Ho (talk) 07:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then definitely oppose. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination and Someone like You (disambiguation). Fortdj33 (talk) 02:05, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No reason not to follow house style in this case. — AjaxSmack 04:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Independent sources (newspaper reviews eg) show a preference for capitalizing the "Like" when using standard title case. The Wikipedia MOSCT is particularly weak in terms of support and exceptions when it comes to prepositions. That someone on Wikipedia wrote down that rule doesn't mean that it represents consensus. Not capitalizing short prepositions is a poor alorgithmic attempt at approximating the real rule, that in title case important words are capitalized. A far stronger consensus principle is that Wikipedia follows its sources. The sources capitalize Like. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per MOS:CT. We have a house style per our guidelines, and we should follow that guidance (in the absence of some exceptional circumstances which do not appear to exist in this instance). —BarrelProof (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per MOS:CT. I also concur with BarrelProof. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clear MOS:CT case, follow our house style. Jenks24 (talk) 13:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose - since when does a style preference overwhelm a WP:COMMONNAME referred to as such in WP:RELIABLESOURCES? There's a kajillion titles on Wikipedia with a capitalized "Like" (both as a preposition and as not). Also, WP:HELPIMTRAPPEDINAFACTORYFORUSINGWPLINKSINSTEADOFJUSTNORMALWORDS Red Slash 16:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.