Jump to content

Talk:Soekiman Wirjosandjojo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Unreferenced? All information are pretty basic information that could be seen on other page already in Wikipedia. See Special:WhatLinksHere/Soekiman_Wirjosandjojo. --IvanLanin 12:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Soekiman Wirjosandjojo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsonal (talk · contribs) 23:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    I made some fixes throughout. Please revert as needed if I introduced any errors.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    This does not impact GA review outcome, but if FA candidacy is planned, the italicization of Indonesian political party and entity names should be updated to conform with MOS:FOREIGNITALIC.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    No issues with reliability of sources. It would be beneficial to update the {{Cite web}} template for Konstituante.net to include Syahrul Hidayat and Kevin W. Fogg as authors to indicate the website's reliability, considering their academic backgrounds.
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk03:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soekiman Wirjosandjojo in 1949
Soekiman Wirjosandjojo in 1949

Improved to Good Article status by Juxlos (talk). Self-nominated at 03:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @Juxlos: Good article. AGF on the citations I can't access. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:30, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]