Talk:Sodium hydride

Chemicals: Core Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Sodium chloride#Crystal structure|NaCl]] The anchor (#Crystal structure) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

It is best to not consider sodium hydride as toxic, as while it is very corrosive to wet human tissues other than its corrosive effect it is not able to damage a human.

What does that mean? It's not toxic, even though it will destroy any tissue that comes in contact with it? Twilight Realm 01:52, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Solubility of NaH

NaH - it is not soluble, I am pretty sure. There are no sources of naked H- in organic solvents. Lots of students think that it is, but they are fooled by the fact that NaH will deprotonate solvents to give a bases that behave equivalently to NaH. Research chemists would crave a soluble form of real H-, uncluttered with BH3, AlH3. I would love to be wrong on this one! --Smokefoot 02:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't it be soluble in water? If we look at alkaline earth metals we can see their hydrides, they react with water and form hydroxide and release hydrogen gas. 42.111.123.14 (talk) 13:49, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

6938 citations and counting as of January, 2017

According to Chemical Abstracts, nearly 7000 papers, patents, and reports describe NaH. We probably are not going to cite even 1% of these. --Smokefoot (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]