Talk:Sociology of leisure
Sociology of leisure has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 30, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that one of the findings of sociology of leisure has been that amount of free time is not significantly dependent on one's wealth? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Draft GA nom discussion
[edit]Was here: [1]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
More on Veblen?
[edit]On that subject, it is remarkable to this observer that an article on the academic field of the sociology of leisure should make only one passing mention—and that in a footnote—of Thorstein Veblen's The Theory of the Leisure Class.--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- In which case it would be laudable if you could make the article less remarkable in this aspect? I mean, Wikipedia is already 99.9% perfect, you can fix this little bit :-) --Milowent (talk) 23:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Feel free to expand on the historical aspect :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sociology of leisure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100119045949/http://www.rpts.tamu.edu/journals/JLR/ to http://www.rpts.tamu.edu/journals/JLR/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)