Jump to content

Talk:Society for Promotion of Community Standards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This seems to be mostly original research and biased.

  • "The Society regularly issues media releases of considerable length, few of which appear to be picked up by the New Zealand media." - most news releases by organisations are not picked up by the media! What does this mean?
  • "On the basis of its actions, it appears this group is largely concerned with criticising the decisions of the Office of Film and Literature Classification (New Zealand) and the current Chief Censor, Bill Hastings, seemingly on the basis that he is gay." - it either is or isn't largely concerned with criticising the decision of the OFLC, and Bill Hastings. Seemingly? Provide a source please. This is just a biased opinion and has no factual basis!

The article might be short, but it's got problems. - Ta bu shi da yu 13:41, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The current version (as at 5 Feb 06) is equally biased, and has erased all analysis of the actions of the Society. I'm not interested in engaging in an edit war - perhaps someone else might like to have a go at a 'balanced' entry? Fastred 5 Feb 2006

Yup, none too good. I know virtually nothing about the group, I just know the writing style was none too good when I saw it. - Ta bu shi da yu 22:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks wikified and neutral now.

Inaccurate description

[edit]

The SPCS was created to oppose moral decline and lowering "community standards". This is not the same as being "Judeo-Christian". The reference to a "strong censorship stand" is peculiar English, and misses the point that the group opposes declining standards, it does not support censorship as such.Royalcourtier (talk) 21:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Society for Promotion of Community Standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]