Talk:Social nudity in Seattle

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Social nudity in Seattle redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Nudity Low‑importance

	Nudity portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Legality - wording

@Taylorjsellers and Mandarax: (You two have edited this bit, so I'm guessing you may know about the content; I can only surmise. But Taylorjsellers is a redlink and has just three edits in their six years here, so they may never even see this note.)

This sentence looks as though it can't possibly be right as written:

Distributing nude photographs to someone if you are underage is equivalent to someone underage receiving them and withholding the photographs in an electronic device or a hard copy.

Is it just as much a crime for a minor to distribute them as it is for an adult to provide them to a minor?
"Withhold" means "hold back, refuse to give". It looks like this is supposed to be "holding" or "keeping".

--Thnidu (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more sources

The article needs more sources and has been tagged accordingly. SunCrow (talk) 02:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]