Talk:Social Contract Press

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006 June 3. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

POV

This is very poorly written. --evrik 02:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What POV issue does it have? -Will Beback 04:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The amazon link shows that only a handful of authors actually publish with the press. [1] Searching on all the other authors (Michelle Malkin, etc.) listed in the previous version shows that they publish elsewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JKMan (talk • contribs) 22:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this is poorly written and has POV issues. Someone is policing edits to prevent it being a neutral account. Citations are needed for the claims and they needed to be separated out. For example, claims that it overlaps with certain political groups such as FAIR, etc. need to be broken down to illustrate the connections to each group. 71.229.155.68 (talk) 02:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have read something they published in 1999 called "The Biocentric Imperative: How Population, Environment & Migration Shape Our Future", Essays by William B. Dickinson and Others from the Biocentric Institute, Airlie, VA. This is not "white nationalist" or "racist" literature. 71.229.155.68 (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, on the basis of a single book, you conclude that you know what the publishing house is all about, despite this, and this, and this, and ... Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability or merge

Judging by the two reliable, independent sources currently cited, this organization appears to fail WP:CORP. The obvious solution is to trim primary puffery and merge this article with John Tanton, as both reliable sources characterize him as the central figure. Grayfell (talk) 03:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The SPLC is the opposite of a reliable source. 2604:2000:1580:425C:1920:48F:A553:49A1 (talk) 09:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Based on what?--Senor Freebie (talk) 12:55, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reliability of the SPLC has been discussed numerous times on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, and has always been found to be a reliable source. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]