Jump to content

Talk:Smooth coarea formula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Gallot, Hulin, and Lafontaine, in Riemannian Geometry, 2nd edition (ISBN 978-0-387-52401-6) state Lemma 4.73, a "coarea formula".

Let ƒ be a smooth positive function on a compact Riemannian manifold (M,g). Then

It appears that vg is a canonical measure, something like a Haar measure; and of course "[t,+∞[" means the same as "[t,+∞)". They cite Burago & Zalgaller, Geometric inequalities (ISBN 978-0-387-13615-8), p. 103 for a more general version. (Unfortunately, that page is not available at Amazon books.)

The theorem in this article is more general, but would seem to have the same flavor. Bad news: no location in the Chavel text is given, and a search for "coarea" in Amazon's version did not show this theorem. Good news: User Beltranc (talk · contribs) who created this article is most likely the same Carlos Beltrán (a recent PhD from Universidad de Cantabria, now a postdoc at University of Toronto) who coauthored a paper published this year in Mathematics of Computation (v.76,n.259,pp.1393–1424), and essentially this theorem does appear in that peer-reviewed paper citing a different source. --KSmrqT 01:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Normal Jacobian

[edit]

Normal Jacobian is not defined in the Jacobian-page. It should probably be defined here in an invariant way. I don't have an adequate reference at hand Lapasotka (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections

[edit]

One needs M and N orientable so that the integrals are defined. Also, there is a more general (and usable) version for functions that are not neccessary positive, but compactly supported instead.

A reference is the book [1] in the special case where F is a Riemannian submersion, from which the general case in the article easily follows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Upmeier (talkcontribs) 11:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Le Spectre d'une Variété Riemannienne by Berger-Gauduchon-Mazet (Proposition A.III.5 on p. 16)