Jump to content

Talk:Smallest organisms

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Amphibian

[edit]

The article on Monte Iberia Eleuth (Eleutherodactylus iberia)states that the Brazilian Gold Frog is the smallest frog in the world. Yet the article on the Gold Frog suggests this is not true and Eleutherodactylus limbatus may be smaller. So there is some confusion here for frog people to sort out.

Myrvin

Plants & Fungi

[edit]

Where are the plants and fungi? Surely there are some tiny examples out there! -Athaler (talk) 15:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nanobacteria

[edit]

Somebody ought to include a brief synopsis of Nanobacteria, possibly in the same section as the Nanobes. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what is this 2kb genome in the virus section? not everyone is a phd at biology ¬¬ 189.113.254.155 (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mircobes

[edit]

This generally talks about genomic size, but it should also talk about physical size. Viruses are small because of their capsid size and because of their genomic size, so both categories should be covered, and bacteria, archea, eukarya. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 20:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't Nanoarchaeum be removed since it is larger than Mycoplasma genitalium? --Oceans and oceans (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warm blooded animal

[edit]

The article says the Bee Hummingbird (1.8 grams and a length of 5 cm) is "the world's smallest bird species and the smallest warm-blooded vertebrate". But later it says that the Kitti's Hog-nosed Bat (bumblebee bat) is "the smallest mammal, at 30–40 mm in length and 1.5 to 2 g in weight".

So the bat is smaller by both criteria than the bird. So the bee hummingbird cannot be the "smallest warm-blooded vertebrate".

Can someone please verify which entry is wrong? Either the bird is not the smallest or some of the measurements are incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.249.1.202 (talk) 20:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smallest animal?

[edit]

Does anyone know what the smallest animal is? I feel like that's kind of important LieutenantLatvia (talk) 22:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nanobes?

[edit]

I feel the article should differentiate between widely accepted categories of organisms such as Eukaryote and more controversial ones such as nanobes - which are geometrically too small to contain the machinery we traditionally associate with life.--Frozenport (talk) 19:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Smallest fish

[edit]

The smallest fish I came across in my re-search is Schindleria brevipenguis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindleria_brevipinguis. Males and females are of similar size. Watson, W., & Walker, H. J. jr. (2004). The world’s smallest vertebrate, Schindleria brevipinguis, a new paedomorphic species in the family Schindleriidae (Perciformes: Gobioidei). Records of the Astralian Museum, 56, 139–142.90.184.244.239 (talk) 21:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Smallest organisms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Smallest organisms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Smallest organisms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Smallest organisms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tardigrades

[edit]

How is it possible there is no mention to the tardigrades in this article? The SMALLEST ANIMAL there is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tardigrade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.140.164.213 (talk) 16:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Repetitious conversions

[edit]

Suggest we put a reminder near the start of the article of what namometres and micrometres are, and then remove the excessively repetitious conversions of those units to millimetres. Ehrenkater (talk) 08:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tiniest Mite

[edit]

I notice that the text around mites is: Cochlodispus minimus is the smallest mite. An adult individual measured with a body length of 79 μm (0.079 mm).[23] However, PBS claims "The tiniest mite on record is 82 microns long" but does not name a species.[24]

I'm not quite sure how the PBS claim is at all relevant or adds information in light of a cited primary source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bphillab (talk • contribs) 22:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Smallest_organisms&oldid=1257440902"