Talk:2018 Slovenian parliamentary election
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2018 Slovenian parliamentary election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving 2018 Slovenian parliamentary election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 June 2018. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Famous candidates ...
[edit]... are arbitrary. After all, people like prominent politicians that will be running are "famous" by default. Otherwise, people like celebrities are just trivia. Unless you can provide a reference for each individual why it is famous. This info is better included in the campaign section in prose. E.g. X party announces that celebrity Y would run for them. --Tone 21:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. This is not appropriate. Number 57 03:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
I said politicians will not be included, for all other that were included, 90% of Slovenian know who they are, i do not know what else should be a "critera" to say if someone is famous ffs...Sredina (talk) 08:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- I mean, isn't that the issue with the section? "Famous" is subjective, but a more appropriate descriptor might be "members of civil society" – though I don't know if there's also lesser-known individuals that also fit that description who wouldn't be notable enough for an article. Mélencron (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- This list more or less compiles people who are put forward by the parties because they are known to some degree outside the scope of politics. Or are being reported as such by the media. Which results in an incomprehensible mess when considering that each party will have a bunch of such individuals. --Tone 13:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Anti elitism and populism are the same ideology. Populism isn't necessarily right wing
[edit]You should change the ideology description of the party good country. It makes no sense the same ideology will be called in different names for different parties. if you see the current right wing popular right wing populism as very different from the populism of other parties you can change it from "anti-elitism" to "left wing populism"
100% results?
[edit]We have updated at 99.99% as at 16:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC) -- Now that we are June 10, shouldn't we an updated 100.00% results? I think our page needs updating werldwayd (talk) 12:29, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Werldwayd: We're still waiting for the CEC to declare the final results. Their website is still on 99.99%. Based on the recent referendum (13 May), it usually takes around a week for the final results to be declared. Number 57 12:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)