Talk:Slouching Towards Gomorrah

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

The article is way too short. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.134.174.93 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: the above comment is not mine.) The article cites a questionable example of "noted inaccuracies in the book," namely, Bork's citation of "Big Man with a Gun" as evidence of cultural decline. The article connects the reader to the composing group, "Nine Inch Nails," but there is no connection given to the lyrics of the song. How is the reader of the article to know that "Big Man with a Gun" is not a rap song or is not evidence of cultural decline without knowing the lyrics and without experiencing the delivery of the lyrics in the original album? It's not enough to read Reznor's disclaimer, since most people don't know who Reznor is, especially among people who do know who Bork is. As it stands, the comment cannot fail to be regarded, at least by many readers, as of questionable merit. A more obvious example, it seems to me, is called for, and one that doesn't refer to arcane knowledge.Fr. Larry (talk) 03:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies?

I do believe that this final comment is an attempt to dismiss the intellectual content of Bork's book, based on on repeated misunderstanding of the modern musical genre a particular song falls into. It is not fair to say that, because of this one error, there is am implied propensity towards other errors that have not been noted. Eddie.willers (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]