Talk:Skyglow

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Skyglow: the effect of poor lighting (CfDS) (examples of skyglow in the UK) - broken link

Article Review:

- Focus on your citations and their formatting. - Looks to be a good start. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSaundersLikeGlue (talk • contribs) 19:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

== Peer Review == clarence

I think this is a really interesting topic and one that should be of worry with the ever growing Urbanization we have talked about in class. There is good information here, however, it seems as though there needs to be more citations made, specifically I noticed in the section discussing the effects of skyglow. Clhen88 (talk) 16:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing this article again, there continues to be need for citations and attribution to main key ideas/points and other significant information that is lacking sources. It it important to keep with the wikipedia guidelines for a well layed out wikipedia page. Overall there is a fair amount of effort put into this wikipedia page. With the proper corrections, this page could see a bright future. It is an interesting topic. Just make sure your stray away from essay style and making opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GSaundersLikeGlue (talk • contribs) 18:46, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial lights can disrupt the migratory schedules of birds causing them to leave too early or too late in the season, missing ideal conditions for nesting. Birds that navigate by moonlight and starlight can wander off course. Millions die every year by colliding into needlessly illuminated buildings. Every year, the Fatal Light Awareness Program (FLAP) “displays” these victims of light pollution to raise public awareness. (51)” “It is estimated that nearly 30% of outdoor lighting is wasted due to this poor design. In the United States alone, wasted lighting accounts for 1.7 million tons of carbon dioxide and $2.2 billion in wasted electricity each year”(38)” “For thousands of years, man lived in synchronicity with day and night patterns, his wakefulness and sleep tracking light and dark. Then he invented artificial light and suddenly our rhythms were out of sync. We extended the day, and got a lot more done—but with impacts to our physiology that we're still only beginning to understand. (27)”

“This kind of engineering is no different than damming a river. Its benefits come with consequences—called light pollution—whose effects scientists are only now beginning to study. Light pollution is largely the result of bad lighting design, which allows artificial light to shine outward and upward into the sky, where it's not wanted, instead of focusing it downward, where it is. Ill-designed lighting washes out the darkness of night and radically alters the light levels—and light rhythms—to which many forms of life, including ourselves, have adapted. Wherever human light spills into the natural world, some aspect of life.(19)

“Light pollution also contributes to atmospheric pollution. Nitrate radicals that help in control of smog are destroyed in excessive artificial lights which increases pollution in the atmosphere.(9)”
“The lighting source which doesn't emit light above its horizontal plane can be classified as proper lighting. If light designs follow this guideline, the problem of light pollution can be greatly minimized. (7)”

“Glare is a visual sensation --162.219.72.138 (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)caused by excessive and uncontrolled brightness. It can be disabling or simply uncomfortable. It is subjective, and sensitivity to glare can vary widely. Older people are usually more sensitive to glare due to the aging characteristics of the eye. Disability glare is the reduction in visibility caused by intense light sources in the field of view, while discomfort glare is the sensation of annoyance or even pain induced by overly bright sources (Rea 2000). Compare the glare from the streetlight shown in Figure 6 to the glare from the(24)”[reply]

Dependence on distance from light source

The narrative here is not referenced, and contradicts published work. Walker (1973) found empirically 1/r^2.5 [cf. Walker's Law]; Garstang (1986) confirms Walker on average but extends to find a variable exponent with distance, from about -1.7 at 10km to about -4 at 100km (ave about -2.3). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cluginbuhl (talk • contribs) 22:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

The discussion about the Tunguska event should be removed. Yes, there are natural sources of sky glow that should be mentioned (but probably not in the intro), but this is not one and it is not correctly described or interpreted. Sky glow following the Tunguska event did not arise from light produced at the event itself. Cluginbuhl (talk) 18:44, 15 April 2016 (UTC) Removed Cluginbuhl (talk) 23:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Effects on the Ecosystem

Wind turbines do not produce any skyglow, and do not have any effect on "human neurology".

The last paragraph, concerning the effects on plants, is not supported by the last source cited, which does not contain the words "photosynthesis", "agriculture" or even "plants" apart from a single mention of electrical power plants. The only reason (some) plants require darkness is to regulate reproduction (e.g. to initiate flowering), and the low level of illumination of leaves by skyglow does not interfere with that, nor is it intense enough to cause photosynthesis. Marijuana, a short day plant, will flower in backyards in large cities. At least I try (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Skyglow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Mount Allison University supported by WikiProject Anthropology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]