Talk:Sivaganga Palace

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil civilization, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil civilizationWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTemplate:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTamil civilization articles

Dravidian civilizations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dravidian civilizations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dravidian civilizationsWikipedia:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsTemplate:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsDravidian civilizations articles

India: Tamil Nadu / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in January 2015.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image

Nvvchar and @Dr. Blofeld: I'm not sure that the image in the article corresponds with the palace, which is said to be in dilapidated condition by the various references. Also, it's unclear from the reference whether the temple is within the palace or on the palace grounds; is this clarified in a another resource? --Rosiestep (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it doesn't exactly look "dilapidated"!♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rosiestep and @Dr. Blofeld:. There are no better sources. I searched for three days. The img was added by another user. I am also not sure so I am removing it. --Nvvchar. 00:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]