Talk:Sir William Douglas, 1st Baronet

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Barony of Castle Douglas

Isn't there also a feudal barony of this name? Is it in any way connected? Cagney & Stacey (talk) 07:39, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I presume the feudal barony would relate to that of the Lords and Earls of Douglas. It was based in Lanarkshire, where there is a town of Douglas. Sir William Douglas of Castle Douglas was not related to the House of Douglas.

However, Sir William Douglas did have the town of Castle Douglas made a 'burgh of barony' in 1791. Sir William had no direct descendants (he died unmarried) but his niece Elizabeth (daughter of William's brother Robert Douglas(1760-1824)) married Sir Robert Abercromby of Birkenbolg, Aberdeenshire and their descendants / the Abercromby Estate remained as 'feudal superiors' of castle Douglas until the Abolition of Feudal Tenure Etc. (Scotland) Act 2000 abolished all the remaining aspects of the feudal system as of 28th November 2004.Alistairliv (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obelisk

Is this reference to an obelisk a mistake? Should it refer to his mausoleum? Or is there a separate memorial? Shipsview (talk) 09:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sir William Douglas, 1st Baronet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311141459/http://lmid1.rcahms.gov.uk/pls/portal/newcanmore.newcandig_details_imgsummary?inumlink=64471 to http://lmid1.rcahms.gov.uk/pls/portal/newcanmore.newcandig_details_imgsummary?inumlink=64471

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]