Talk:Sir John Ellerman, 1st Baronet

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Mid-importance).

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Sir John Ellerman, 1st Baronet is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sir John Ellerman, 1st Baronet be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Thomas Wilson Sons & Co.

I think this is not an entirley fair statement, the compnay was still a very successful outfit, especially as a family business, when Ellerman bought it. It was heading for harder times, but if not for the personnel troubles it probabaly would not have been sold to Ellerman anyway. A link to Sowald Sanderson may be worthwhile as well, as his relationship with Ellerman is indicitive of the sort of person Ellerman was and how he ran his business. The current O.S. article is very small but is in progress for exapansion. El Scorcho 14:09, 27 July 2006 (UST)

I think the point in the source is the family was at dispute with itself, a common fate of family companies by the third generation, not that it was in financial difficulties, and you have misinterpreted my precis of this. However, as this matter is peripheral to Ellerman's biography, I have removed both sides of the coin. The fate of the company should be discussed in its own article. Hawkestone 11:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hull maritime project

This page is part of a WikiProject that links all artciles relating to Hull's maritime history in this period. Hull Maritime Project

Possible useful source for this article.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/humberside/hi/people_and_places/history/newsid_8207000/8207903.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.41.91 (talk) 12:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Author's Point Of View & Referencing

The opening statement of this article is a classic example of multiple POV.
An article of this length and importance needs many more inline references.
Some references do not contain relevant material.
With these issues it cannot possibly be rated a 'B' class article.--Kudpung (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]