Talk:Sinner (band)

Discussion

This page has some stuff that is wrong concerning the "inactivity" sentance and the discography missing about five albums. Original studio albums at that, not compilations or live albums. Tomorrow, I will consult with a friend who is an even bigger fan than I and update it soon. I didn't add the MUSTARD/cleanup thing, but if anybody else is taking notice of this article, it'd be cool if there was some other input. Konsek 21:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I lost track of time, but I finally did it. I have written the history of the band and updated the discography. The discography section looks rather unwieldy but I don't have enough experience to sort that out. I also didn't touch the 'Album Sales' section as I have absolutely no idea about any of that stuff. Konsek 23:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I removed the album covers from the discography section, no other bands seem to have them there, just on dedicated discography pages. Konsek 19:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was to move to Sinner (band) --Lox (t,c) 08:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

---

SINNER → Sinner – {Actual name of band is Sinner, not capitalized.} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page

Voting

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

• Oppose as per my comment-reply-comment below. --Lox (t,c) 21:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Discussion

Add any additional comments

• Comment Sinner currently redirects to Sin, perhaps a move to Sinner (band) would be more apt? --Lox (t,c) 21:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Which is why it's on the requested moves page. There's no need for a Sinner (band) page when when there's no actual Sinner page.--Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 20:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I appreciate that there is no article entitled 'Sinner', but since the current redirect of Sinner to Sin has been around since June 2002, I can't think of a compelling reason to remove it. I would however support a move to Sinner (band) and the addition of: "Sinner redirects here. For the band, please see Sinner (band)." to Sin. --Lox (t,c) 21:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
      • I see I'm not going to convince you otherwise, so I'll go ahead and do that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme (talk • contribs) 02:24, 19 January 2006.
        • If anyone can cite a policy, guideline or give a good reason to move this page to Sinner (removing the current redirect to Sin), I will happily support such a move. However, at this present time, I cannot see any reason to remove a redirect as old as Sinner. Since this page has been moved, I am archiving this discussion. However, if you feel that this page should be moved to Sinner, either let me know at my talk page or propose another move at WP:RM! --Lox (t,c) 08:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:Sinnerlogo.jpg

Image:Sinnerlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sinner8.jpg

Image:Sinner8.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)