Talk:Simla Agreement

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

India: Himachal Pradesh / Jammu and Kashmir / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Himachal Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bangladesh Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article falls into the work area of the History workgroup of WikiProject Bangladesh

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Untitled

Uhhh, if I'm not wrong, isn't it "Shimla" instead of "Simla"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulveriser (talk • contribs)

Shimla is the new name of the town. When the treaty was signed, the town was called Simla. Shimla is infact as recent as the 1980s, if I am not wrong -- Lost 15:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Troops helds as prisoners of war?

This article says that 34,000 of those held by India as prisoners of war were military, while Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 says that 79,676 were uniformed (and over 50,000 were Army personel). Which number is right? Molinari 02:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikisource

The text of the agreement should be moved onto wikisource --PBS (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge to Simla Agreement DBig Xray 11:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is another article (Simla agreement)about the same subject and having same title but different case. As Simla Agreement is a proper noun, this title follows the WP:TITLE guideline and therefore I propose merger of Simla agreement into this page. --SMS ^Talk 15:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

'Indo-Pakistani War' or 'Bangladesh Liberation War'

Most of the internal links listed under 'Indo-Pakistani War of 1971' are the war fraught between Mukti Bahini and West Pakistan army. Moreover these are happen before 3 December 1971, when India took part on war officially. I think it should changed to Bangladesh Liberation War.--Freemesm (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]