Talk:Silver Screen Partners
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]The article that is being reverted is from Variety, which is a perfectly legitimate source, and "find articles' is a respectable link system. Why is it being claimed to be problematic? Paul B (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank You Paul, you're the man, can you believe they actually blocked me for 55 hours for saying this (you gremlins). I guess the Bush administration is also proactive on wikipedia. Go Barack ! User: AlexLevyOne 17:10, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm watching "The Rescuers Down Under" and the title says: "in association with Silver Screen Partners IV".
Why is The Rescuers Down Under not listed here? Any ideas? Erichviedge (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
1982 or 1983?
[edit]When was Silver Screen Partners founded, 1982 or 1983? 71.95.53.89 (talk) 18:18, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Walt Disney Productions or Walt Disney Feature Animation?
[edit]Wasn't The Black Cauldron made when Disney's animation department was still called Walt Disney Productions? It wasn't called Walt Disney Feature Animation until 1986 (the same year that the company itself {Walt Disney Productions} got renamed to The Walt Disney Company). 71.95.53.89 (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class filmmaking articles
- Filmmaking task force articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Disney articles
- Mid-importance Disney articles
- Start-Class Disney articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles