Talk:Silent Talker Lie Detector

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Silent Talker Lie Detector article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Orphan Tag removed

The orphan tag is removed. There are sufficient links with other articles of wikipedia.Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 05:09, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

No mention of the various controversies attached to this?

For example....

https://theintercept.com/2019/07/26/europe-border-control-ai-lie-detector/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.213.139 (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://techcrunch.com/2021/02/05/orwellian-ai-lie-detector-project-challenged-in-eu-court/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFbZJPpIVTDFqb5_h1LDPnaDrzB0nNwbzcqoI2EIzOy6jjYvtCsUqZ6MQ2avf1ti8X0anFWlv-LVVw8qXEUCy2hJ6KcTX1S_6qtFiwsnsVhOdcgnNqwIhF9pNA2fcPQn6qAyq5HU0AKq5Ww5I_FIRLZP2bCrQJGIPpfMQ3dYFKsD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.213.139 (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another one: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/03/13/905323/ai-lie-detectors-polygraph-silent-talker-iborderctrl-converus-neuroid/ AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of edits made by one of the creators - is this legit?

The page appears to have been made by "jamesdoshea", who is credited as one of the creators of Silent Talker. Is this allowed under Wikipedia rules? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.213.139 (talk) 18:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At the time the article was created, it possibly wasn't. As of now, stricter standards apply: see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Truth, Ethics, and Deception

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hypomanix (article contribs).

Working on editing this

This page needs a great deal of expansion if it is to be useful to anyone. I am currently researching the topic and related research to provide scientific information on the legitimacy of the claim made here and links to other Wiki articles on lie detection devices. Pyrperson (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If such sources can be found, that would seem a good idea, though frankly I doubt it exists, since the whole thing seems to be based on wishful thinking, and as such unlikely to attract independent research. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what you are saying, but there are some people (and even governments) spending money thinking this will work. The citations show why using this device is wasteful. The original stub didn't make this clear. If this page has outlived its usefulness, then the community will decide it isn't needed. I wanted to make the content more correct as long as it lasts. Having looked at many primary sources as well as the ones that are referenced here, I don't think there is anything more to be found.Pyrperson (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pyrperson: Looks great. Nice job on expanding this! Looks great. Rp2006 (talk) 02:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]