Talk:Sigma

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece High‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

entry removed

cell (biology) Receptor_(biochemistry)s in biochemistry and pharmacology

Can't find any info about this anywhere. Dab pages are supposed to link to wikipedia pages that otherwise would get mixed up. No such page exists for this concept. Tedernst | talk 22:12, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The entry under computer science for linguistics is a good candidate for deletion. 2600:1700:8B40:4660:39CE:DA28:A789:87FD (talk) 00:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horniness in a book is science?

Uhm,

"a measure of horniness by Lawrence Waterhouse in Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon"

Would perhaps be better to make that an entry in new section "Fictional something".

159.51.236.194 13:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly haven't read the book. It's used as the variable in a scientific/mathematical measurement. -- Loweeel 15:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well no, I haven't, so I wouldn't push the matter. Still, that book is classified as "historical fiction", and I'd rather have a more solid source. Is that Lawrence Pritchard Waterhouse guy for real or just an invention, and if he's for real, did or didn't he use Sigma for a horniness measure?

In some way the idea of calculating chances of gaining information from an informant based on their horniness *could* make sense so I'm .. still lost.

159.51.236.194 16:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, see for yourselves here -- http://newark.pardey.org/book/cryptonomicon/slide63.html . Waterhouse is fictional, but he DOES use Sigma for a horniness measure. -- Loweeel 11:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, come now, fictional science isn't science. In the absence of a verifiable use of the word in that use, let's just either delete it or move it to popular culture. Richard Pinch 18:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MS markup

Is that "may mark a line that is out of place" or should it be "marks a line that may be out of place"? Richard Pinch 19:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sigmas in Unicode

Why has Unicode separate code points for uppercase sigma, non-final lowercase sigma, and final lowercase sigma assigned? --84.61.40.91 09:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because, as the first line of the article states, lowercase sigma is written in different forms in non-final and final positions. Richard Pinch 06:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More importantly, final sigma and non-final sigma have different numerical values -- see Greek numerals -- Theorbtwo (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry, that comment was incorrect, I think I was thinking of Hebrew. A section on unicode has been added to the main article, with a reference, that answers this question. -- Theorbtwo (talk) 08:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sound

Am I missing something, or does this article make no mention whatsoever about the sound(s) produced by sigma in classical and modern Greek? I don't happen to know myself (that happens to be why I came here in the first place), or I'd add it myself. Perhaps someone would be so kind? LordSnow (talk) 21:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added, finally. — Eru·tuon 14:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the sentence telling that Σ was spelled as /z/ before /m/ or /n/ in ancient times: this is still a fact in modern language, too.--Κλειδοκράτωρ (talk) 01:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a vital bit of information, that is almost hidden in the article. It should be in the first paragraph. Maikel (talk) 14:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode

Some of it isn't appearing when I come to this and other articles (there is just a blank square/box). Is there somewhere I can download the fonts? Forgive my unlearned approach to computing! ArdClose (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lunate sigma

Does the name "lunate sigma" come from the fact that it looks like a half-moon? (latin Luna = moon) If so, this should be mentioned in the article. --NetRolller 3D 18:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Greek life"?

Does anyone know what the section "Greek life" is talking about? Sounds pretty much like gibberish to me. Wyverald (talk) 12:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ς and σ vs. s and ſ

In the latin alphabet until a century ago, long s (ſ) was in common use, analogously to ς and σ. Short s (s) was used at the end and after a long s (ſ) hence the ligature ß in German from ſs. So in English Odysseus would have been Odyſseus and not Odyſſeus, like (Ὀδυσσεύς). I checked by googling as I was not taught greek and -σσ- is correct. Regardlessly, the two are very similar, I have no idea who influenced who (lower case came from the latin alphabet so I'd assume it was that was too, but short s reappears in post carolingian scripts, so the habit was not there from the start), so I think it should be mentioned. --Squidonius (talk) 01:53, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can't say about the exact sequence, but the distinction in Greek must be the result of a formalization and standardization of earlier handwritten practice that happened during the adaptation of minuscule handwriting to early Western printing. In origin, both lowercase forms are just cursive versions of "lunate" C-shaped sigma, with and without a connecting line towards the right. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure the ß is actually a ligature between ſ and the "tailed z" that looks like an Ezh (Ʒ). This is also stated on the page for Z#Variant_and_derived_forms. 2003:D5:B74A:54DC:F548:9757:2273:AEC (talk) 19:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology?

What does the name of the character, "Sigma", mean, or if lost to late meaning, then have as its origins? 67.171.248.22 (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Answered here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing cut-and-paste move

I'm going to do a complex fix to an old cut-and-paste move that happened on 2008-03-10.

Up to now:

the old history of the Greek letter Sigma article up to 2008-03-10 has been in the page history of Sigma (letter)
the more recent history of that article is in the page history of Sigma.
the old history of the disambiguation page up to 2008-03-10 has been in the page history of Sigma.
the more recent history of that article is in the page history of Sigma (disambiguation).

I'm going to swap these. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma in popular media

Sigma is also used to designate the creative fraction of the "Alpha" Artificial Intelligence in the popular web series Red vs. Blue,

i am not a registered user so i can not add this myself, please consider this for the articles Miscellaneous section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.12.110.53 (talk) 06:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed "but the sound is derived from Phoenician samekh, which appear as inconsistency in transcribing sibilants"

This remark sounds exceedingly strange to me:

1) We don't know how the Phoenician Samekh and Shin were pronounced 2800 years ago. There is little reason to believe it was the same as in modern Hebrew. It is not unlikely it still was an affricate as most scholars today believe to have been in Proto-Semitic. The fact the Greek Ksi is derived from Samekh is circumstantial evidence for that.

2) Neither Greek nor Latin distinguished (as Greek still doesn't do it) between /s/ and /ʃ/. Even if Samekh and Shin had had the modern Hebrew sound values back then, there is no "inconsistency".

Berndf (talk) 18:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's stick to the source and mention

shape and position of shin
sound and name of samek

Sibilants part in source:

Sibilants ... are notorious tripping points between languages generally.
— David Sacks, Letter Perfect: The Marvelous History of Our Alphabet From A to Z

AgadaUrbanit (talk) 07:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with the name is discussed in the following section (etymology). I don't think we have to give the explanation "name of samek", especially when we say afterwards that this is only ONE theory.

With respect to the claim that sigma has the "sound .. of samek", 19th century semitologists generally believed samek to have been [s] and shin/sin [ʃ]. Today, this is definitely not consensus view any more. It is still consensus view that shin and sin were merged in Northern Canaanite (i.e. Phoenician) but a largely held, probably majority view today is that samek was [t͜s] and shin/sin [s]. On Phoenician language we write:

The original value of the Proto-Semitic sibilants, and accordingly of their Phoenician counterparts, is disputed, with many scholars arguing that š was [s], s was [ts], z was [dz] and ṣ was [tsʼ], while others stick to the traditional sound values of [ʃ], [s], [z] and [sˤ] as reflected in the transcription.

I don't have access to Sacks' book. What exactly does he write and if he really claims sigma to have taken the sound value of samek (which, I still maintain, would be a meaningless assertion, if he meant [s] vs. [ʃ], as Greek never phonemically distinguished the two sounds)? And how does he explain position and sound value of xi?

Berndf (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usage as the letter E

Can we add this topic? The upper case sigma is similar in appearance to the upper case "E" that it's sometimes used artistically to replace the upper case E in non-Greek languages to suggest a Greek-related subject matter. See title font of My Big Fat Greek Wedding. Ssredg (talk) 05:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Companies Section

Do we really need the section for the companies named after the letter? It's not very long, and isn't adding very much to the article. Steeldragon7 (talk) 00:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode as an "encoding"

In the encoding tables, shouldn't "Unicode" rather be UCS4 or UTF-32? Calling Unicode an "encoding" is a bit misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.176.129 (talk) 16:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Final sigma

Is there any special history of the final sigma, compared to other letters in Greek alphabet that doesn't have final form? Bennylin (talk) 13:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DI‑GAMMA / VAU : Smooth‑breathing & SIGMA / SAN : Rough‑breathing

Hello, from the Ancient‑Greek studies at dis‑tance, that I have per‑formed in Belgium in 2012, the "Smooth‑breathing" and "Rough‑breathing" serves to in‑dicate & marking the ab‑olition of the archaic letter Di‑gamma Ϝ [v] (Smooth) or Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ [ʃ/s] (Rough) in the word, the Ϝ or Σ/Ϻ can be at beginning or middle, it de‑pend of the position of the breathing.

{Di‑gamma Ϝ {also called ϜΑΥ : vau/vaw} is V be‑cause W was Υ/ΟΥ [u/w] from Phoenician 𐤅 [u], Ϝ don't share shape and sound with Υ / 𐤅, after some‑time Υ be‑came later [y] and [i] in Modern‑Greek ; Pamphylian Digamma/Wau/Waw Ͷ is [w], also Ϝ [v] be‑came Latin F [f], V & F are labio‑dental sound and can be con‑fused, when W & F have nothing in com‑mon, so Latin letter F sound [f] come from Ancient‑Greek letter Ϝ sound [v]...}.

http://www.webtopos.gr/eng/languages/greek/alphabet/earlyletters.htm (Source as V)
http://www.webtopos.gr/eng/languages/greek/alphabet/upsilon.htm (Source as U, W)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digamma#Pamphylian_digamma

In the French pre‑cise book of Ancient‑Greek "Le Grand Bailly" or "Abrégé Bailly" breathing (spirit in French) are re‑pre‑sented in the words and in the de‑finition, in [RAC : racine/root] Section is ad‑ded the original word with Di‑gamma Ϝ or Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ. In older editions of "Le Grand Bailly" or "Abrégé Bailly", the "Table of roots" (which is no longer pre‑sent in the new editions) speci‑fies the list of roots using Di‑gamma Ϝ [v] & Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ [ʃ/s], yet in Wikipedia English or French, no one mention that the "Smooth breathing" and "Rough breathing" was used for Di‑gamma Ϝ & Sigma/San Σ/Ϻ removing, why ??? They talk only about a‑spired H (no one can make a‑spired H be‑fore a RHO, it's im‑possible), so it's wrong... Also In Wiktionary page for Ancient‑Greek words using breathing, the W/V or S/SH is never mentioned in "Archaic pro‑nunciation", like for ex‑ample :

ὙΠΕΡ / HYPER that was originally writed ΣΥΠΕΡ / SHYPER [ʃuper] (Latin : SVPERIOR), or
ἙΞ / HEX → ΣΕΞ / SHEX [ʃeks] (Latin : Six) or
ἘΞ / EX → ϜΕΞ / VEX [veks] (Latin : Ex‑) or
ἘΡΓΟΝ → ϜΕΡΓΟΝ [verg‧on] (English : Work, Dutch : Werk) or
ἩΛΙΟΣ / HELIOS → ΣΗΛΙΟΣ / SHELIOS [ʃɛli‧os] {Attic} (Latin : Sol, Solis, English : Sun) or
ἉΛΙΟΣ/ ALIOS → ΣΑΛΙΟΣ / SHALIOS [ʃali‧os] {Dorian} (Latin : Sol, Solis, English : Sun) or
ΟἸΝΟΣ → ϜΟΙΝΟΣ [vojn‧os] (Latin : VINVM, English : Wine, French : Vin) or
ἈΡΗΣ / ARES → ͶΑΡΗΣ / WARES [warɛs] (God of War, War God, war it‑self personi‑fied) or
ῬΕΩ → ΣΡΕΩ [ʃre‧ɔ] (flow) & ῬΕΩ/ἘΡΩ → ϜΡΕΩ/ϜΕΡΩ [vre‧ɔ/ver‧ɔ] (Speak/Verity/Love) or
ἈΝΑ → ϜΑΝΑ or ΑϜΝΑ [vana / avna].

{I don't use ac‑cent acute / grave in Ancient‑Greek words be‑cause at that time they didn't ex‑ist, also writing Ancient‑Greek word in minuscule is an error, be‑cause at that epoch only capital script with‑out ac‑cent ex‑isted, minuscule should be used only for Modern‑Greek in your Wiktionary or Wikipedia...}. Gmazdên (talk) 12:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Unicode character - ΢

Did you seriously forget to add "΢" to your Unicode chart?? --Brynda1231 [Talk Page] [Contribs] 13:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brynda1231 (talk • contribs) [reply]

SineBot, I ALREADY signed that, why did YOU need to sign my signed comments on me!--Brynda1231 [Talk Page] [Contribs] 13:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brynda1231 (talk • contribs) [reply]

Later history of lunate sigma Ϲ vs. angular sigma Σ

The article explains when lunate sigma Ϲ went into fashion, and that it became the universal form of the Greek letter during the Middle Ages. But when and why did it fall out of fashion? It's said to still be used in decorative texts, but the angular sigma Σ appears to be overwhelmingly more common today, even in Greek handwriting and cursive, and the article does not explain that. - Gilgamesh (talk) 08:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gilgamesh~enwiki: This probably happened in the course of the Classical Greek revival in newly independent Greece in the 19th century, when Katharevousa was established as the official language of the country. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 19:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Early history of the lunate sigma

The article does mention that the lunate sigma already appeared in the Hellenistic period, but skips the early Roman period. The Harnouphis inscription from the later second century AD shows only lunate sigmas too, so I wonder if this letter shape wasn't established as the standard form already before late antiquity. Wikipedia's treatment of palaeography, especially Greek palaeography, seems to neglect the early Roman period, which is rather strange.

(I've noticed the same phenomenon in other subjects too – more than occasionally, the presentation of the history of a subject skips from the Hellenistic period or even Classical Greece right to late antiquity or even the Middle Ages, as if the early Roman period was a poorly documented period ... however, it is anything but.) --Florian Blaschke (talk) 19:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patricck bateman

add Patrick Mateman in pop culture references 2A00:1370:81AC:5D57:C4B8:683C:B4C3:C721 (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

500 178.247.183.231 (talk) 03:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure, you might be referring to Sigma male. This is a different article with the same name, but the usual “Sigma” is for letters or whatever. Oldschoollover24 (talk) 10:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Delinked the couple words, uppercase and lowercase to uppercase and lowercase in the lead sentence to remain consistency. 2001:EE0:4BCA:90E0:DC97:2FF6:583C:A2A0 (talk) 13:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Unclear what consistency you are looking for. It is normal style to wikilink only the first occurence of the term. RudolfRed (talk) 05:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this word Internet slang?

Right..? 2A02:C7C:728D:E100:7C21:D58:92FF:7A7F (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably looking for the article Sigma male. Joyous! Noise! 16:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sigma used to signify scientific certainty

There is no mention in the subsection on physics that sigma is used to signify scientific certainty. I'm not a scientist, but I'm very surprised I was unable to find any mention of this very common usage of "sigma," in context of physics. 114.23.160.45 (talk) 04:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we include its meaning in media?

personally, I think there should be some sort of mention of it otherwise no Normalwriter810 (talk) 12:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean in media and do you have a reliable source for that meaning? Furius (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Furius as in pop culture, generally referred to as "brainrot" meaning Normalwriter810 (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Furius Heres a link to a page that explains this pop culture meaning; Sigma male Normalwriter810 (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right, thanks for that. Seems reasonable to include a link to that article in the text of this article. But probably no more than a sentence, to avoid presentism. Furius (talk) 14:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

If you haven't you should add how some people call themselves a sigma to show independence and bravery also im new to this so I don't know how it works .aryawashere (talk) 18:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Exists at Sigma male FifthFive (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of usage on Tiktok

shocked there is no mention of the tiktok usage when we have a article about rizz and other tiktok 71.241.134.156 (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Irrelevant. Kolano123 (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]