Talk:Siegbert Tarrasch

Chess C‑class High‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some Changes

Added "most influential chess teacher" to intro.

In Chess Career, made style changes, added cites and anecdote re "check and mate." Even if aprocryphal, it's a cool story!

Comments welcome.

Eldred 07:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Play Versus Teachings

This is one of my favorite chess articles, despite its brevity, for the following two lines alone;

He was a great target of the hypermodern school, led by Richard Réti, Aron Nimzowitsch, and Savielly Tartakower, all of whom criticized his ideas as dogmatic. However, many modern masters regard Tarrasch's actual play as not dogmatic.

Finally, someone who gets it. The best way to judge the playing strength and style of an old master is not by some stodgy, over-simplified assessment of their skill in an old book written by a weaker player, but by actually looking at their games Anyways, I agree tremendously with this assessment of Tarrasch's play, and was shocked it was actually noted in the Wikipedia article, fearing that people would go by his overly dogmatic chess writings. (Ostensibly written for much weaker, beginning players)

Whoever wrote the lines above certainly has my respect and gratitude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChessPlayerLev (talk • contribs) 11:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ChessPlayerLev (talk) 11:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Capablanca on San Sebastián, 1912 --Philcha (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong statistics

Tarrasch had a narrow plus score against Harry Nelson Pillsbury of +6-5=2, while Lasker was even +5-5=4.

Augsburg 1900 was a casual game, in tournament games Lasker had a plus score +5-4=4 against Pillsbury, too. How can one trust in rubbish like "chessgames.com"? Poor Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.138.43.139 (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vienna 1898 tournament

This article does not mention the 1898 Vienna tournament, which Tarrasch won and whcich was among his greatest achievments. Shouldn't that be included in here somewhere? 2001:9E8:6CC0:F200:450E:1DFB:5152:23E3 (talk) 07:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]