Talk:Sidney Poitier/Archive 1

Archive 1

Date of knighthood

1974? I thought he got his KBE decades later than this, perhaps closer to 1994. Any clues? Maybe just a typo. JackofOz 03:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

After some research, I'm more confused than ever about this date. I never found 1994; but three other years were mentioned:

• 1968 — Five sources, including http://www.africanamericans.com/SidneyPoitier.htm which I would expect to be careful about facts.
• 1969 — Filmbug.com (which seems dubious as a source on other grounds.)
• 1974 — Both the IMDB and About.com, which are generally reliable.

So I don't know what to recommend. I'll see what I can find in the British Honours Lists, but they're PDFs and a bit of a pain to search through. --ChrisWinter 17:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

And what do we mean by "by right and recommendation of his Bahamian citizenship"? Nobody ever gets a knighthood "by right", or merely because they happen to be a citizen of a particular country. What is this all about? JackofOz 02:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Off the top of my head, I think this is just formal language that means he is a citizen of the British Empire. While there are exceptions, it is rare for knighthood to be awarded to anyone who is not. --ChrisWinter 15:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, the British Empire ceased to exist a long time ago. Maybe you mean he's a citizen of a country that is a Commonwealth Realm, ie. a country that acknowledges the British monarch as its head of state. The best resource I know of for details of honorary knighthoods awarded to citizens of other countries is our List of honorary British Knights. JackofOz 08:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Just for clarification, he would have been born a British subject in 1927, become a Citizen of the United Kingdom & Colonies in 1950, and would then have become a Bahaman upon independence in 1973. As the Bahamas is a Commonwealth Realm he is entitled to a full title (rather than an an 'honourary title', as would be the case if a citizen of a country that is not British or does not recognise such titles). This does not detract from possible US Citizenship. However, Britain did not recognise dual nationality until the Citizenship Act, so I don't know what his status may have been from 1950 - 1973 (as the Bahamas would then have its own nationality laws).Roche-Kerr 20:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not too sure about the specifics of the OBE, but should we put his name at the beginning of the article as Sir Sidney Poitier? Jutm543 21:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

If he's an american citizen he can't be a Sir —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.104.199 (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

He can be Sir Sidney if he's also a citizen of a Commonwealth Realm, as discussed above. P.G. Wodehouse is another example of this situation, Wodehouse had British citizenship but he also took US citizenship as he lived in America permanently. When he got a knighthood it was a full one due to his ongoing UK citizenship, and it wasn't affected by the US citizenship at all.--88.112.158.247 (talk) 03:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sidney-poitier01.jpg

Image:Sidney-poitier01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Editing questions

I've just made some changes (rephrasing, putting in missing words, etc.). I want to change two more things, but first I need some confirmation that they really are mistakes.

(Emphasis added in both cases.)

"Sir Sidney Poitier, (First Ever Black Man) KBE (born 1927-02-20) is a Bahamian-American actor. He has been hailed as a breakthrough star whose acclaimed performances which, by consciously defying racial stereotyping, gave a new dramatic credibility for black actors to mainstream film audiences in the Western world."

I know this means that Poitier was the first black man to receive a KBE. But, unless it's part of the title (which I doubt), there's a better was to say it than "(First Ever Black Man)".

"His fifth daughter is actress Sydney Tamiia Poitier."

The double-i in her middle name is almost certainly due to keybounce. Still, with proper names come some unusual spellings. I thought it wise to check. --ChrisWinter 15:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, blow me down! It is correct! (Per Google, IMDB, and several others.) I hope one of those "i"s is silent; otherwise I can't get my head around how to pronounce it. --ChrisWinter 16:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

DOB?

Article states 1924 and 1927 as year of birth. What is actual year of birth?RexRex84 06:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

He was born in 1927, several sources, including the 1930 U.S. Census and Intelius have confirmed it. This ref states that he has said he was born 1924, however some of the actors that have been interviewed in it, have lied about their birthdates. For example:Ingrid Bergman, Joan Crawford, Anthony Quinn, Katharine Cornell made themselves younger. Is it not possible that Poitier made himself 3 years older? Therefore this reference is unreliable, so I will remove it and restore the 1927 birthdate.79.124.57.97 (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

YouTube?

i removed a sentence under trivia claiming he was famous for reviewing youtube videos. google didn't turn up anything. seemed like spam. if it can be substantiated, then someone can add it back i guess. --Doinelita 00:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Lysistrata

In the Sidney Poitier article, there is a sentence that states: “On his second attempt at the theater, he was noticed and given a leading role in the Broadway production "Lysistrata", for which he got excellent reviews.” Sidney did not get excellent reviews in this play because he got stage fright and ran off the stage. I read this in a book about Sidney Poitier. Exit EMERGENCYx 04:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

You'll need to tell us the book's title. Cop 633 13:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Here's the book : Bergman, Carol. Sidney Poitier. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1988. Exit EMERGENCYx 01:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

You got a page number? ;) Cop 633 01:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers priority assessment

Per debate and discussion re: assessment of the approximate 100 top priority articles of the project, this article has been included as a top priority article. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

To add

He is also ambassador from the Bahamas to UNESCO. Badagnani (talk) 07:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

You forgot to mention that Sidney Poitier also has an honorary degree of fine arts from the University of Miami. He received it in 1986 along with Federal Reseve Chairman Paul Volcker who received an honorary law degree. I am surprised, nay, shocked that Sidney Poitier didn't receive more honorary degrees. The URL is: http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1986-04-23/news/8601240555_1_honorary-degrees-volker-drucker I sincerely doubt that the students at any school would object to him being awarded another degree. I didn't read it carefully enough, but why does he have a French surname? hhhobbit (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 05:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

The Simple Life of Noah Dearborn

Y Done Article created. Darkspots (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

I was surprised to see that this movie was not listed in the Filmography. Is there some reason for this? Johnfos (talk) 04:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

It's listed in the television section, because it's a MOTW. [[Usoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo{| class="wikitable" border="1"

|- ! header 1 ! header 2 ! header 3 |- | row 1, cell 1 | row 1, cell 2 | row 1, cell 3 |- | row 2, cell 1 | row 2, cell 2 | row 2, cell 3 |}er:Darkspots|Darkspots]] (talk) 07:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Still surprises me that we don't have an article on it. Johnfos (talk) 07:53, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Acting career

According to the article, Poitier was "handily" rejected by audiences. What does "handily" mean in this context? "Handily" seems to be an adverb from "handy", but since (in UK usage at least) "handy" means "convenient", this seems to say that Poitier was "conveniently rejected by audiences". Surely this isn't what the article means to say! 62.252.232.18 (talk) 00:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC) Whoops. Logged in: Tonywalton ^Talk 00:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

"In 1963, Poitier became the first black man to win an Academy Award for Best Actor"

Was he also the first to be nominated? I think this is also relevant and interesting. Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 09:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Hattie McDaniels was nominated and won for Gone With the Wind(1939).Ovr'apint (talk) 18:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC) So Poitier was the first MAN. Ovr'apint (talk) 19:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

The first paragraph

What's up with it? I don't know enough about the way page formatting works to identify what's gone wrong, but the formatting is definitely off.--72.130.131.28 (talk) 22:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

People from Mt. Pleasant

On what basis is he in this category? Cloonmore (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Long Break From Acting

I believe Poitier quit acting for about ten years from the late 70's to the late 80's, but I don't know why. I think whatever the reason is should be included in the acting career portion of his page. All I know is that he wasn't in any movies but still directed movies during that time, most notably stir crazy. If anybody knows the story about his hiatus I think it should be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dancon7 (talk • contribs) 08:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Looking in IMDB I don't see signs of any such break. --ssd (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

VERY SIMPLE AND OBVIOUS EXPLANATION: HOLLYWOOD WASN'T INTERESTED IN SIDNEY ANYMORE, AS THEY WERE, BY THE 1980S DIMINISHING, AND OTHERWISE DEMOTING BLACK MALE ACTORS ACROSS THE BOARD. EVEN WHEN HOLLYWOOD WAS GOING THROUGH ONE OF ITS PERIODIC "RECESSIONS, AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR INDEPENDENT TALENT AROSE, BOTH IN DIRECTION, AND ACTING, SIDNEY WAS NOT CONSIDERED BY ANYONE FOR A "RESUSCITATION" OF HIS CAREER. RACISM, FOR SURE, BUT UNDERSTAD THIS: SIDNEY PORTIER WAS NEVER KNOWN AS A "FIGHTER"!!! --65.88.88.40 (talk) 17:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Veryverser

Answer is blacklist for decades. This needs to be on his page if someone smarter and less lazy than me wants to write it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madglee (talk • contribs) 03:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Blacklist

Why is there nothing about him being blacklisted for over a decade? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madglee (talk • contribs) 03:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Nationality

On the first sentance of the article on Sir Sidney Poitier, shouldn't it say he is a Bahamian-American actor, instead of African-American actor? He has close ties to the Bahamas, as well as the United States. Although born in the United States, he grew up in the Bahamas, and has been the Bahamian ambassador to Japan since 1997. Jordancelticsfan (talk) May 3, 2010 (UTC)

Concur. This is what is generally used for actors born or raised in other countires which their parents are from, regardless of status as a citizen now. His birth in the US was circumstantial. - BilCat (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

A quick look at the history of the article shows that "Bahamian American" or a similar form has been used for most of the article's history. At some point it was changed to Bahamian American with a hidden "US citizen comment". This is unnecessary, as the first line of the Bahamian American states "Bahamian Americans are citizens or residents of the United States of Bahamian ancestry." That fits Ambassador Poitier, does it not? - BilCat (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Knighthood and Bahamanian Citizenship

Whomever stated the following to me did so anonymously, but this seems to confirm that Sidney Potier's KBE was, at least at the time of its awarding, honorary, rather than substantive:

"Knighthood is honorary not substantive, see:

   a) https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11245449
   b) https://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/05/25/iraq.franks.knighthood
   c) https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-06-14-mn-2281-story.html

Also, confirmed to me by email from Guy Blanch (Investiture Office Senior Honours and Investiture), Clerk Central Chancery of the Orders of Knighthood, St James’s Palace London SW1A 1BH (TEL: 020 7930 4832) (EMAIL: investitures@ccok.x.gsi.gov.uk)"

I believe that the confusion is caused by the claim that Poitier possesses Bahamanian citizenship, which would typically entitle him to a substantive knighthood. HOWEVER, I suspect the claim that Poitier possesses Bahamanian citizenship is actually false. The UK did not recognize dual citizenship until 1981, by which point the Bahamas had become independent. The Bahamas has very strict rules regarding the recognition of dual citizenship, which Poitier would not meet. He was a natural born citizen of the United States, and, unless anybody can prove otherwise, it appears that the only citizenship he possesses is American citizenship. Therefore, I am removing the claim that Poitier possesses Bahamanian citizenship unless it can be substantiated.

Hopefully this settles the question. IRN-Dumas (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for that. A few points:

• The National Archives link says it's Honorary, but then goes on to refer to Poitier as "a United States and Bahamian citizen". That is as useful to this discussion as a bag full of armpits.
• The other two are American newspaper reports. With all due respect, they're not the world's most accurate sources when it comes to the finer points of British nomenclature. I can remember when Bob Geldof was awarded his honorary knighthood and we were all told by the media that it did not come with a Sir, yet those very same media then blithely ignored their own advice and now his Sir is rusted on despite being completely wrong.
• British laws about dual citizenship apply only to people who are British citizens or residents. They do not apply to people who are citizens or residents of other countries. Whatever other citizenship he may have, if the Bahamas recognises Poitier as a Bahamian citizen, that is all that matters as far as this discussion is concerned. I understand that Bahamian law may have changed, and would/may have reflected British law before achieving independence. It's possible Poitier did not qualify when the knighthood was awarded but does qualify now.
• "The Bahamas has very strict rules regarding the recognition of dual citizenship, which Poitier would not meet." - can you provide some source for this statement? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 21:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

  In order to be recipient to a substantive, rather than an honorary, knighthood, he would have to be a citizen of a commonwealth realm (i.e. either the UK or the Bahamas):

  • When Poitier was born, there was no such thing as Bahamanian citizenship; Bahamanians instead were British citizens. Being born in the US, he was granted natural US citizenship at birth. He would not have been granted British citizenship at birth. At the time the UK did not allow for dual citizenship, so the US citizenship would be the only one he could have held.
  • For people in Poitier's situation, the Bahamas allows for dual citizenship up to the age of 21, at which point one must renounce one. Otherwise, dual citizenship is not allowed. Poitier was already over the age of 21 when the Bahamas became a state, and there is no indication that he renounced his US citizenship.
  • As he had US citizenship, but could have had neither British nor Bahamanian citizenship, his knighthood would have had to have been honorary.

  Thankfully information about both the defunct British citizenship laws and the current Bahamanian citizenship laws is more plentiful than information about Poitier's knighthood, so you should be able to easily find some if you want to.

  Hopefully, fourteen years later, this citizenship point might have cleared up the confusion around his knighthood. IRN-Dumas (talk) 07:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

  So, you're saying he has only ever been an American citizen, never British and never Bahamian. I guess we'll leave it at that unless more definitive information comes to light. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 23:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

  And yet, he was the Bahamian Ambassador to Japan for 10 years 1997-2007, and Bahamian Ambassador to UNESCO for five years 2002-2007. I know that non-citizens are sometimes appointed honorary consuls, but I've never heard of a non-citizen being appointed a country's ambassador. Why wouldn't he have been referred to as "honorary ambassador", in line with the "honorary consul" designation? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 23:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

  I'm unconvinced about the claim of Bahamian dual citizenship law. I read [1] and the constitution [2]. Someone can renounce their Bahamian citizenship having turned 21 and if they acquired or plan to acquire some other citizenship. If they acquire or exercise the rights of some other citizenship, the governor general may by order deprive them of their citizenship. And there is a set process to follow to deprive someone of their citizenship. But I see no suggestion it happens completely automatically.

  I'm not planning to study this in depth, but I have looked into the Malaysian situation before, and the Malaysian constitution has a similar provision. In Malaysia, people generally assume that someone automatically looses their Malaysian citizenship if they acquire or keep another citizenship after 21. But all evidence I've seen is this is not the case. Instead, the government has to go through the process to remove your citizenship. If the government finds out you have dual citizenship after 21, it almost definitely will happen as a matter of public policy. But it still requires the right person in the government finds out. And more to the point, since it's a matter of public policy rather than law, i.e. the law only allows rather than requires the government deprives someone of their citizenship. The government is free to not do so.

  I strongly suspect the situation is the same in the Bahamas. What happened with Sidney Poitier, I have no idea but it seems to me it's most likely perfectly possible he did retain his Bahamian citizenship if the government chose not to deprive him of it despite him having dual citizenship, which they were probably perfectly entitled to do so. I suspect it's also possible he was given Bahamian citizenship again, if he did lose it, article 13 seems to give parliament the right to grant citizenship in other cases although I didn't find what laws have been passed regarding that and what provisions they have about someone having another citizenship.

  Note that while in many cases, the constitution does not allow someone to acquire Bahamian citizenship if a citizen of some other country, this does not apply to article 3 section 1 and section 2 of the constitution, and section 2 may apply to Poitier. It also doesn't seem to apply to article 13 in the sense that parliament could make it part of their laws, but I see nothing to suggest they have to. Also article 13 seem to preclude any automatic deprivation of citizenship acquired under article 3 section 1 and 2 other than by changing the constitution.

  Nil Einne (talk) 07:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

• Like User:IRN-Dumas, I have also contacted the Central Chancery of Knighthood and have been advised the following:
  • The knighthood was honorary, "based on his nationality at the time"
  • It was dated 1 July 1974, when formal approval was given
  • Honorary knighthoods are not gazetted. These days they are published on the Honours Lists page on www.gov.uk, but they were not aware of the practice in 1974
  • Whichever government proposed the award, "recommendations for Honorary Awards are put forward by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs to The Sovereign"
  • "If an honorary award recipient subsequently acquires a Realm nationality then the recipient can make representation for its conversion into a substantive award to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office." - there was no suggestion that Poitier has ever made such a representation. This would be consistent with the fact that Poitier does not use the KBE postnominal.
• I'm happy to share the email with any interested editors.
• So, we should terminate our speculations about what Poitier's citizenship would have been or must have been, and be satisified with the information that, as far as the Foreign Secretary's Office was concerned, Poitier was not a citizen of a Commonwealth Realm in 1974. Whatever may have happened in the years since then is essentially irrelevant. Unless Poitier has applied to convert the award to substantive. Which he hasn't. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 20:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

  Hello.

  I commented above concerning the knighthood or the lack thereof, but I see that quite a bit else has been going on on that score down here. I understand what is being said, but my question is whether or not we are certain that the application for conversion from honorary to substantive is an absolute requirement. Not to belabour the point, but I seem to remember that when Sir John Paul Getty Jr. acquired British citizenship, the Queen herself remarked to him that he could use his title thereafter. I didn't get the sense that a formal application was required beforehand.

O.ominirabluejack (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)O.ominirabluejack

I can only refer you to the email from the Central Chancery of Knighthood that I quoted above. In particular: (a) The knighthood was honorary, "based on his nationality at the time", and (b) "If an honorary award recipient subsequently acquires a Realm nationality then the recipient can make representation for its conversion into a substantive award to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office."

I know of other people who were knighted while not being Commonwealth citizens, who subsequently gained such citizenship, and who have NOT applied to have the knighthood converted, and who remain NOT Sir. Whatever you may have read about Getty and the Queen is not relevant here, because it is undoubtedly not the full story. Even she cannot cause a non-Sir to become one by simply saying so. The UK monarchy does not operate on an "off with his head" basis.

Poitier is a KBE, but is NOT a Sir. The ball remains in his court to make application to change that, but it's now been 45 years since he was knighted and he shows enormous disinterest in making any such application. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 19:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

The lead is way too long

Should either be shortend or move the info down.

What should be removed from the lead? Jim Michael (talk) 17:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

What is the argument that Sidney Poitier lived on a plant-based diet?

What is the argument that Sidney Poitier lived on a plant-based diet? Online documentation seems to suggest that he swore off alcohol and red meat and 'ate vegetables at every meal' and was health conscious. He had been seen at vegetarian and animal rights events in East Coast cities. There seems to be documentation that he followed health-motivated semi-vegetarian diets without alcohol but that he suffered medical maladies that health vegans had been promised would be statistically very rare. Comfort foods like ice cream seem to have found their way into his diet. MaynardClark (talk) 17:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

References

Lead sentence

I have boldly changed the lead sentence from "Bahamian-American" to "American". He was born in America and is a native born American citizen. He spent most of his adult life living and working in the United States, and he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom. IMO the lead sentence should describe him simply as American and not as a hyphenated American. I have changed it; let's discuss here. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

That doesn't change the historical fact that Poitier also had Bahamian Citizenship. https://www.latimes.com/obituaries/story/2022-01-07/sidney-poitier-dead

"In 1997, Poitier, who had dual American-Bahamian citizenship, was appointed as the Bahamian ambassador to Japan. When Hurricane Dorian hit the Bahamas in September 2019, Poitier said he had 23 relatives who went missing." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:CF80:7440:5C97:5CED:781E:6260 (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

And yet again I change it back to Bahamian-American — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.249.42 (talk) 01:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Slight Inaccuracy

Sidney Poitier was not African-American. Saying he got roles that became increasingly prominent than other African-Americans were getting at the time is not correct. Black people are not just Africans. It should be worded differently to say something like "people of colour" for instance based on the reasoning stated. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 02:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

I see a lot of this argument about Kamala Harris. It makes no sense. She and Poitier have dark skin because their ancestors were slaves brought to the Americas from Africa. That obviously makes them African American. The Bahamas has no dark skinned native people. HiLo48 (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Sidney Poitier and Bahamian independence

I overheard the Prime Minister of the Bahamas telling BBC Newshour today about Poitier's role in helping them gain independence, rousting the white oligarchs from power, etc. I'm not seeing any of that in the article right now. I'll try to come back to this but the best I can do right now is suggest it be included, and I've found some resources:

https://news360world.com/2022/01/08/tributes-to-sidney-poitier-pour-in-from-hollywood-and-beyond/ “He used his celebrity status, his connection with his friends in the United States to help promote majority rule for our country,” Mr. Mitchell said. “And he was very much a part of it, no question.”

https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/4-ways-sidney-poitier-was-a-trailblazer-on-and-off-the-screen/16849/ His first film prompted the formation of a political party that later overthrew a government.

https://bahamaschronicle.com/sir-sidney-has-made-invaluable-contributions-to-the-bahamas-2/ During his involvement with civil rights movement in the United States in the 1960s, it was well known at the time that Sir Sidney used his celebrity status to focus attention on the concomitant struggle for equal rights and to stamp out racism in The Bahamas.

Also, https://time.com/5647667/sidney-poitier-dies/ Why All Actors—and the World—Owe a Debt to Sidney Poitier GXIndiana (talk) 03:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sydney Poitier" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sydney Poitier and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 8#Sydney Poitier until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 06:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Knighthood and Sir

This issue seems never to get resolved. As some point out above, Poitier is a citizen of the Bahamas, which recognises Queen Elizabeth II as its monarch. The default position for a Bahamian is that a knighthood from the Queen would automatically come with the right to use the prenominal "Sir". He's also a citizen of the USA, but that does not detract in any way from his Bahamian citizenship.

Yet we're now being shown sources that say clearly his knighthood was honorary, meaning he gets KBE after his name but no Sir before. How can this be so? Can the Queen divide his being into two halves, the Bahamian half and the American half, and bestow a knighthood on his American half but not on his Bahamian half? I just don't get it. Can anyone explain this paradox to me? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 02:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

By the way, I have searched for the official notification of his knighthood in the London Gazette and its Supplements, so that we can put this to rest one way or another once and for all, but have come up empty-handed. Maybe others have better searching skills. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 02:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

@JackofOz and IRN-Dumas: It seems you two have opened two different discussions about this topic at the same time on the two different ends of this talk page, one on the top and one on the bottom. And it seems that IRN-Dumas has answered Jack of Oz's question: Poitier does not seem to be a Bahamian citizen, which would clear the confusion. I have now removed the "Sir" from his name. Spike (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

I've now moved IRN-Dumas's post to the bottom, where it belongs. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 21:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

In its extensive obituary piece on tonight's BBC News at Six, the BBC chose to refer to him as "Sir Sidney Poitier". Just sayin'. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

They'd probably do the same for Bob Geldof, but "Sir" Bob Geldof is equally wrong. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 03:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

The BBC report on his death has the following comment. "As a Bahamian citizen he was eligible for a substantive knighthood, but given he was a US resident and Bahamian by descent the Bahamian authorities preferred it to be an honorary award." Hack (talk) 12:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Poitier had both American and Bahamian Citizenship

Although born in the US, which automatically gave Poitier US Citizenship, he mostly lived his early life in the Bahamas, and therefore he also had Bahamian Citizenship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:204:CF80:7440:5C97:5CED:781E:6260 (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Various sources state he was a dual Bahamian-American citizen, plus he served as an Ambassador of The Bahamas, therefore, he was a citizen of the Bahamas not just an American. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.249.42 (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Knighthood was honorary

Editors are starting to change text/categories back to substantive knighthood. Already established (see discussions above) that the knighthood was honorary. 107.127.46.63 (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Why was it only Honorary? The Bahamas, of which he was a citizen, is a Commonwealth realm with Queen Elizabeth II as head of state, it is my understanding that an honorary knighthood is only applicable to a citizen of country of which the Queen is not head of state? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.249.42 (talk) 22:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

@31.205.249.42 -- the knighthood was honorary (evidently because Poitier did not want a substantive knighthood even though he was entitled) and this has been confirmed by Guy Blanch (Investiture Office Senior Honours and Investiture), Clerk Central Chancery of the Orders of Knighthood, St James’s Palace London SW1A 1BH (TEL: 020 7930 4832; EMAIL: http://investitures@ccok.x.gsi.gov.uk). By all means, contact the chancery if you choose. If you read the discussions above on this very page you would have seen all that. 107.127.46.63 (talk) 03:19, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Citizenship

Can people stop changing his citizenship to purely American, of course he was born in the United States making him an American citizen but he also was a citizen of the Bahamas. There is a thing called dual nationality! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.249.42 (talk) 01:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

the country of Israel claims "right of return" on every single jewish person in the entire world. so would we also need to go through the articles of anyone in judaism to add their dual nationality status? Flynnwasframed (talk) 01:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Sir Sidney Poitier

Please be advised that as the holder of an honorary, not substantive knighthood, Poitier is not referred to as Sir Sidney Poitier. As an honorary KBE, he entitled only to the postnomials after his name, i.e. Sidney Poitier, K.B.E.. Thanks. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 17:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

This isn't true. Portier's knighthood isn't honorary as the Bahamas uses the British honors system... as a citizen he is entitled to use "Sir" before his name. Similarly, if a holder of an honorary knighthood becomes a citizen of a Commonwealth realm their knighthood automatically becomes substantive. -- MichiganCharms (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Sir Sidney Poitier is entitled to be styled as 'Sir' as he is a Bahamian citizen, which also makes him a Bahamian subject, as The Bahamas is a Commonwealth realm, with Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II serving as Queen of the Bahamas. This means Sir Sidney's knighthood is substantive, and not honorary. Laggan Boy (talk) 19:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Per MOS:HONORIFIC, the Sir should not be used before his name. Read this guideline before making any further changes. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 17:37, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Poiter was born to parents who were both British subjects and as such he is by birth, and by present current citizenship of the Bahamas, as entitled to be awarded a full Knighthood as any other British citizen, past, or present.

Unlike some countries, whose own 'natives' didn't get citizenship of their own country until as late as 1924, people of any race or colour born within what was the British Empire gained full British citizenship by birth, either due to location of birth, or by descent from their parents. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.10.248 (talk) 08:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

To Bahamian TV, he's Sir Sidney. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYv5QUT_zKI (Though the ZNS presenter uses the recent American pronunciation of his surname, 'Poy-teer', which isn't what he was called at the Oscars when he won Best Actor: in the Sixties it was 'Pwa-tee-ay', French style.) He presumably did use his correct title when acting as Bahamian ambassador to Japan and UNESCO, since he was representing the Sovereign. But he doesn't normally use it in the US.

For one thing, the US is a republic. For another, he was hurt by the foolish, fashionable white-liberal / black-radical claim that he was a sell-out and an Uncle Tom, back in the late Sixties and Seventies. This Observer article from 2000 comically records how he always drove Cadillacs so that no one could say he drove a Rolls or Mercedes, but when the crummy Cadillac broke down and the black GM mechanic who came to fix it treated him like the enemy because of the 'sell-out' thing, it turned out to be a bit of a false economy. The article also records how Poitier (now driving a smooth BMW) takes the interviewer to lunch at legendary LA celebrity eaterie Spago, where the waiters, at 3pm, with lunch service long over, jump up and go, 'Lunch, Mr Poy-tiere? No problem. Let me show to your favourite table,' and the chef himself comes by and goes, 'Sidney. Always good to see you. I have a wonderful salad. A dressing to die for.' Because in the US a celebrity name is equivalent to an aristocratic title and the class system is at least as rigid, vicious and stratified as pre-1914 Europe while pretending to be egalitarian.

https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2000/oct/08/features.magazine37

Khamba Tendal (talk) 18:29, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello.

I see that someone has taken the initiative and robbed Sir Sidney of his proper style. This is wrong.

If Sir Sidney, as a Bahamian, isn't entitled to his pre-nominal, then why is Sir Cornelius A. Smith? Is it because he's the governor-general and Sir Sidney isn't? Please rectify this, or I might be moved to do so myself.

O.ominirabluejack (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)O.ominirabluejack

See my replies to the thread below. We do not operate on the basis that something happened in Case A so it must also apply in Case B.

Essentially, Poitier is not Sir Sidney because he was NOT a Bahamian citizen at the time the knighthood was awarded (1974), and since becoming a Bahamian citizen he has never applied to have the knighthood converted from honorary to substantive. The ball is in his court. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 19:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)