This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sicily, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sicily on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SicilyWikipedia:WikiProject SicilyTemplate:WikiProject SicilySicily articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Leonese. inform yourselves. sicilian is not unique, nor unstress neutralizing (also in romanian and slavic languages like russian), thus universal overall, not unique within romance, nor one subfamily on its own (nor neapolitan by reducing in its own ways). older literature on romance languages is uninformed (and biased politically? sometimes?) Yoandri Dominguez Garcia 17:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
I tagged the first two, then noticed that all citations are incomplete in one or several ways. In the worst cases, they are useless. North Carolina Studies... is an ongoing series of unrelated monographs, with nine independent volumes published in 1973, none of them identifiable by either title or author as likely sources for Sicilian phonology. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]