Talk:Sicilian Defence, Katalymov Variation

Should merge this with Sicilian Defence, it's a rare side line, not a major variation like the Dragon or Najdorf. MaxBrowne (talk) 04:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see any drawback to keeping it. (Schiller gives over three pages to it.) What is hurt by keeping this article? (The opening isn't refuted, and notable GMs have adopted it.) Is this a "policy" thing? (And if so, for what good aim? Not to mention consistency issues, which are always negated arbitrarily with WP:OTHER STUFF argument. Consistency is a protection against biased enforcement of policy. WP:OTHER STUFF is often use for a POV agenda.) What is really wanted here!? Ihardlythinkso (talk) 12:18, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same can be said for the Chekhover Variation or the Poisoned Pawn Variation which is a variation of the Najdorf variation. I reckon that each of these variations deserve their own place. --Itemirus (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]