Talk:Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology High‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Shuttle Radar Topography Mission is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

External Links

I have expanded this article, but I have not, so far, posted an external link to Free SRTM data with voids corrected using topographic maps, although it would seem to me to be relevant and informative. The reason: that site is mine and for me to post such a link could be considered contrary to WP:EL#Links normally to be avoided (clause 3). Viewfinder 17:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does your site state the license of your improved data or are they in public domain? Bumbulski 11:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The terms of use are linked to the link above, but can be accessed directly on my home page. Provided any uploaded or distributed products derived from these data mentions their source, or the distributor obtains my written permission, no fees are payable and no licence is required. Viewfinder 16:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I find Viewfinder's void-corrected SRTM data incredibly useful, and generally recommend it (rather than the official uncorrected dataset) as a good general-purpose DEM, I have added it to the main article. — ras52 12:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Viewfinder 15:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Void-filled SRTM datasets

I just added this section. I know it's far from perfect, feel free to improve it. The main reason I added this is because it's hard to find the best datasets out there. After personal communication with the scientists behind the HydroSHEDS and CGIAR-CSI datasets, they confirmed with me that the algorithms used for version 3 and 4 of the CGIAR version is what is best at the moment and for the coming years. However, no scientific article is available yet since the HydroSHEDS dataset is still in the process of being released. Lordsatri 14:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think one important point is how the void filled datasets are produced: are they made by interpolation from the surrounding data, or are they by done by reference to other data sources (or a mixture)? In the case of Viewfinder's, I know it is all (almost all?) done from additional sources, but I in the case of the others, I don't know. — —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ras52 (talk • contribs) 14:41, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

As far as I can tell from their listed sources, only SRTM and 30" sources have been used by HydroSheds, so however good their interpolation algorithms may be, they necessarily exclude mountain summits that fall within SRTM voids, and have no high resolution data north of 60 degrees of latitude. The CGIAR sources are more various, and include Viewfinder data, but for some areas, including the Alps and Karakoram, CGIAR did not get round to using Viewfinder data. In these areas the results are no improvement on pure interpolation, and there is also no polar data. Viewfinder voidfills are wholly from topos, there is no interpolation other than between contours derived from topos. Declaration of interest: I am the author of the Viewfinder data. In general, I have not created data for areas where I found existing data to be adequate, so my coverage is partial. Viewfinder 16:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original motivation for mission?

I wonder if anyone has some information to contribute about the original defense department motivation for the mission? I understood from word of mouth that the radar mapping mission coincided with a strong need for this information to allow unmanned aerial vehicles to operate safely around the world, and give the remote pilots a visualization of the terrain. It is certainly on the same timescale. Does anyone have a link to such info to add to the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supernova87a (talk • contribs) 20:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aster GDEM released

Aster GDEM has now been released making it the highest resolution publically released DEM. --Firefishy (talk) 02:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The ASTER data however is not actually functionally an improvement over SRTM regrettably. See http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2010/01/13/aster-not-worth-it-yet/ for example. --Speedevil (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Void filled datasets

The CGIAR dataset is not global in that it does not cover areas north of 60 degrees N or south of 60 degrees S. Viewfinder Panoramas] has been global since December 2012. I cannot update the relevant section as I am the proprietor of the Viewfinder Panoramas site, but I would appreciate its update. Viewfinder (talk) 23:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DTM or DSM?

I think the expression "digital elevation models" in the text should be qualified with a "DTM" or "DSM"; I would do the mod myself, unfortunately I don't know the answer (and will have to find it outside Wikipedia...) --AlainR345^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 19:11, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not so easy to find a direct answer... but here's what the NASA FAQ says about that to the question "Did the radar sample the tops of trees or the ground level?": The radar does not "see" through thick vegetation canopies. It probably penetrated a little way into some canopies, but in general it followed near the top of the canopy. --AlainR345^{Techno-Wiki-Geek} 19:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the SRTM C-band (5.6 cm) radar probably penetrated into vegetation to a variable extent, depending on the type of vegetation. This means that it is technically neither a DTM nor a DSM, but something in between. EricJFielding (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110721081314/http://www.iacm.forth.gr/_docs/pubs/4/Nikolakopoulos_et_al_2006.pdf to http://www.iacm.forth.gr/_docs/pubs/4/Nikolakopoulos_et_al_2006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:12, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160607102637/http://geodesy.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/Rexer_Hirt_2014_DEM_AJES_av.pdf to http://geodesy.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/Rexer_Hirt_2014_DEM_AJES_av.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

30 arcsecond data available

30 arcsecond data is available as of 2018 in the EarthExplorer platform https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Maps-for-free Sierra Nevada.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]