Talk:Shuhari

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shuhari article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Martial arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Kanji definitions

The explanation of the second kanji reads:

Ha (破:は, "detach", "digress")

Looking it up, that doesn't seem to be an accurate definition. The listed meanings there are: rend; rip; tear; break; destroy; defeat; frustrate.

In fact, "detach" and "digress" are listed as meanings for the third kanji, 離.

Could someone natively proficient in Japanese please review this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oconnor663 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not native proficiency in Japanese, but after consulting the kanji dictionary you cited, as well as Tuttle's "Kanji and Kana", I'd have to agree that the cited definition ("detach", "digress") is not accurate. This 破 (Ha) means "to tear" or "to break", which the explanation "to break with tradition" says. 離 (Ri) means "to leave" or "to separate" which seems to be correctly defined and explained in the article as "transcendence". Naturally, there's much more depth to the concept than the simple sum of the kanji, but I'd have to agree with you that the meaning of 破 (Ha) should be changed.

A high-level kendo friend of mine gave me a tenugui with "shuhari" written on it and a card explaining the concept. When I have time, I'll translate it and incorporate it into the article somehow. Quillaja (talk) 12:23, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any progress on clarifying the correct spelling? 193.189.114.13 (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Go

Any good references to the Go connection? Stephen B Streater (talk) 10:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dreyfus Model

This seems somewhat (very?) similar to the Dreyfus Model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyfus_model_of_skill_acquisition). Might it be useful to link between these? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.248.83.2 (talk) 06:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Origin:

The references provided are inaccurate in the dates. Fuhaku Kawakami was born in 1716, yet the article states that Zeami Motokiyo extended this concept, which is impossible since Zeami Motokiyo was born in 1363. At this time it seems the origin is unknown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.124.209 (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]