Talk:Showdown (Cheers)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Showdown (Cheers) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Showdown (Cheers) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 1, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that, after low first-run viewership, the Nielsen ratings of Cheers improved during the summer between the finale of the first season and the second season premiere?

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 13 July 2012 by reviewer Cyan Gardevoir (talk · contribs).

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on June 28, 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Showdown (Cheers)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 15:55, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues:

Lede: Doesn't matter what time it aired at
- Done. --George Ho (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lede: Remove ref. it is suppose to summarize article, which should have ref.
- Done. --George Ho (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Production: Add a "production" section, who are the "writers", "directors", etc.
- Done. --George Ho (talk) 16:50, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Production: If it is created, "After this two-part season finale was filmed, NBC renewed Cheers for the second season, as announced on March 1983" would go in there
- Done. --George Ho (talk) 16:50, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ratings: 9:30pm should removed
- Not done. It is necessary, regardless, for readers to know what time it aired. --George Ho (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reception: The TV Guide → TV Guide
- Done. --George Ho (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On hold. Main issues is to add production section. TBran dl ey 16:24, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added the non-free image with fair use. --George Ho (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Good Article??

I'm sorry, but how does this qualify as a good article? The English is atrocious and in spots almost unreadable! It sounds like it was written by a kid, or someone for whom English is a third language. It needs a lot of clean up before I would consider it to be a good article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.66.64.246 (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]