Talk:Short Night of Glass Dolls
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 2012
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 10:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Short Night of Glass Dolls → La corta notte delle bambole di vetro –
Short Night of Glass Dolls → La corta notte delle bambole di vetro. I feel its best to use the original title of foreign media whenever possible, as to me translation can be seen as placing undue importance on the English-language, an issue which is neatly avoided by simply using untranslated titles. See Nude per l'assassino, Le foto proibite di una signora per bene, Ruma Maida or Sang Pencerah for a few examples at different assessment qualities. GRAPPLE X 12:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- No objections, or better, I'm neutral.--Cavarrone (talk) 12:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:NCF#Foreign-language films. Deor (talk) 21:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. The guideline is very clear. In accordance with per WP:NCF#Foreign-language films, since this is the English-language Wikipedia, we use the title more commonly recognized by English readers. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 15:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Article needs to be Expanded
[edit]This article is way too short and needs to be expanded in far more detail than what it currently has. The plot section needs to be expanded, more information on the film's reception needs to be added, and information on the film's production needs to be added as well in order for this article to qualify as a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2014 (UTC)