Talk:Shore Line East/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nazcheema (talk · contribs) 09:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starting the review

Hi, all. I will commence this second review soon. Thank you. Regards, Naz | talk | contribs 09:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Full review criteria checks

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for the six good article criteria:

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is clear and concise, without spelling or grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead (e.g., limit of four paragraphs):

C. MoS compliance for layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable with no original research?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Inline citations to reliable sources where necessary (e.g., direct quotations):

C. No bare URLs WP:BAREURLS:

D. No original research:

E. No copyright violations:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

This being an excellent article now that the refimprove banner has been lifted, I am having no hesitation in passing, it is a GA review success. I would be recommending that this might be worthy of an FA nomination, it is easily the best article of those I have been reviewing to date. Very well done and thank you, Pi.1415926535. Regards, Naz | talk | contribs 14:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]