Talk:Shivalli Brahmins
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shivalli Brahmins article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Language correction
[edit]Just a small correstion. Words like upanayana and sagothra are not words from tulu but are from sanskrit. Isn't it appropriate to state that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.163.25.48 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 30 March 2007
Copyright problem removed
[edit]One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The History section was copied verbatim from: http://www.kakkilaya.com/shiva1.html. I removed the infringing material, and it must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. The source has a copyright notice that reserves "all rights". (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —Finell 05:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Unsourced statement
[edit]Someone put this statement, "It is currently thought that the lowly role amongst the latter was due to an attempt at maintaining line purity by the first Shivali Brahmin men who migrated to the South and married local (non-Brahmin) fisher women." Generally, in most traditional Brahmin societies, women's roles in religion were limited. So there is no reference supporting this statement. So I have removed the statement. Raj2004 (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Are the Shivalli Deshasthas?
[edit]We would like to use the Upanayanam picture in this article for Deshastha Brahmin. But the picture is not admissible unless we prove it's a Deshastha boy's upanayanam. Can you confirm or deny that the Shivalli Brahmins are Deshastha like the Madhva Brahmins from North Karnataka? Thanks. Zuggernaut (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
no they are not.11:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
File:Sri sir Vishwesha Theertha Swamiji.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Sri sir Vishwesha Theertha Swamiji.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
| |
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC) |
Truth about shivallis
[edit]"It is currently thought that the lowly role amongst the latter was due to an attempt at maintaining line purity by the first Shivali Brahmin men who migrated to the South and married local (non-Brahmin) fisher women." This statement is the real fact and shivallis are really born in this way from moger/marakalas/fisherwoman and also other caste woman.So they are having kulanamas like baris of shoodras with names ending with aaya,naaya ,thaaya, laaya.e.g shoodra name paduvannaya is also there in shivallis.See the similarities like kotiyannaya became kotian ,saliyannaya became saliyan similarly this kulanamas. It indicates from where and which caste we shivallis married for the first time. Refer Tulunadu for this. There was no need of removing the statement-- shreesha kedilaya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivashambo (talk • contribs) 05:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Fisher woman reference
[edit]I removed this statement "On the fourth day there is a symbolic representation of fish catching in brides house to represent the actual origins of shivalli women from mogers (i.e. fisherwoman)and other castes.[1]. " There is no academic reference supporting this statement.Raj2004 (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
References
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Shivalli Brahmins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160114022217/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/bengaluru/upper-caste-families-look-other-communities-945 to http://www.deccanchronicle.com/bengaluru/upper-caste-families-look-other-communities-945
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
- Wikipedia articles under general sanctions
- C-Class Hinduism articles
- Mid-importance Hinduism articles
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- High-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Karnataka articles
- High-importance Karnataka articles
- C-Class Karnataka articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Karnataka articles
- C-Class Mangalore articles
- Top-importance Mangalore articles
- C-Class Mangalore articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject Mangalore articles
- WikiProject India articles