Talk:Shirley Coryndon

This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Year of Science, a collaborative effort to improve the content of science content on Wikipedia. To learn more about how to participate, visit Wikipedia:Year of Science/Get Involved.Year of ScienceWikipedia:Year of ScienceTemplate:Year of Science bannerYear of Science articles

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology: Paleontologists Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the paleontologists taskforce.

infobox

the m:Objective_Revision_Evaluation_Service indicates that the infobox adds to the quality of this article. if you have questions about the algorithm, ask there.

i presented objective evidence, and you presented a subjective personal essay. Beatley (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you think this infobox is in any way an improvement on this article? Cassianto ^Talk 18:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i do not "think": it ORES says -

with infobox "B": 0.0210501882918298, "C": 0.0353715360713943, "FA": 0.0022212558146308954, "GA": 0.008359664816324717, "Start": 0.6039562175026347, "Stub": 0.3290411375031854 [1]

without infobox "B": 0.017376208902974293, "C": 0.03728389340564461, "FA": 0.0020169749742451116, "GA": 0.008084433890642086, "Start": 0.5290789107271683, "Stub": 0.4061595780993255 [2].

do you have an objective fact to consider ? Beatley (talk) 23:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Marion Parris Smith for why ORES is useless or counterproductive for this task of determining whether an infobox is actually a helpful addition. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please provide objective evidence why an infobox is not an improvement. Beatley (talk) 21:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The onus is on you to justify why one should be added. Cassianto ^Talk 21:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the onus is on you to collaborate. you may imagine that your blocking of progess on 200 biographies is collaboration, but it is a matter of time until a consensus shouts you down. whenever, you have some objective metric to support you essay, then you might have something constructive to say.