Talk:Shipley (UK Parliament constituency)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Shipley (UK Parliament constituency) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

candidates

The candidates can't be candidates until the poll is called. Before then, they're prospective candidates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The law has now been changed so calling a person a candidate no longer starts their expenses running. - Galloglass 12:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

recent history

The current analysis of the last election result is extremely poor and clearly written by a Labour supporter. The BNP got a greater share of the vote than the Greens, and there is no evidence provided or available to support the author's viewpoint.I have refrained from rewriting myself as a member of another party to avoid introducing further bias 87.194.56.53 (talk) 21:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it, am a Greenie, but Labour were perfectly capable of losing Hornchurch despite UKIP, BNP, Residents Assoc and Third Way standing, no Green or other left candidate and virtually non-existant LibDem presence in the borough81.106.148.202 (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Shipley (UK Parliament constituency)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires inline references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires empty sections completing

Keith D 10:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 06:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shipley (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]