Talk:Sherwood railway station, Perth

Sherwood railway station, Perth has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 12, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Australia: Western Australia / Perth / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sherwood railway station, Perth is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Perth (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sherwood railway station, Perth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Reminding you in case you have forgotten. Steelkamp (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's on my to do list, I just haven't had time to have a focused input here for a while. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, thanks for the reply. Steelkamp (talk) 15:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

If "Kingsley" was a legitimate alt name, perhaps should be in bold and add a redirect to here.
"was renamed to its present name" bit clunky repetitive.
Can you link level crossing?
"Two car parks with 47 bays in total are on either side of the station" always find this awkward, do you mean "There is a car park on both sides of the station, with a total of 47 bays"?
Instead of "large" for gap, perhaps be explicit, source says 130mm I think.
"the same year the adjacent Challis station opened" -> "as did the adjacent Challis station".
"The station was originally named Kingsley station" repetitive.
"due to Kingsley in the northern suburbs of Perth causing confusion." -> "to avoid confusion with Kingsley in the northern suburbs of Perth".
No more up-to-date info on boardings than 13/14?
- Sadly no. Figures are only ever released on an ad hoc basis.

That's all I have. Apologies for the delay. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done everything. Steelkamp (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]