Jump to content

Talk:Shaike Ophir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Shaike Ofir)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Officer.JPG

[edit]

Image:The Officer.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

This article has been renamed from Shaike Ofir to Shaike Ophir as the result of a move request.

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was - Moved as no objections. Keith D (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Until about a month ago there were 2 articles and they were merged. But since Ophir is the more acceptable transcription for "אופיר" (per my best knowledge), I think it should have been done in the other direction.

Targumon (talk) 08:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.