The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 1 November 2023 by Vodello.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Hi Szolan. As you know, I've been looking at your page. You previously had 16 links to specific articles, I assume they all mentioned Shahrzad Rafati in some way. you now have a lot of links to landing pages of websites - none of which add anything. A reference is a place that someone can go to find more information about a fact, preferrably as accurately as possible. As a priority, can you make all your references more accurate, and then come back to me in IRC. WormTT· (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think your article looks pretty good; however, I would like to see some of your external links incorporated in references instead if you can. There is still some unsourced information on the page that I believe could be easily sourced. Ryan Vesey (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It certainly seems better in regards to the external links; although, it still needs cleanup. I think Worm That Turned might have some additional suggestions now that you have taken care of the referencing. Many editors rush to get their article onto the mainspace and get it deleted in the process and we don't want that to happen. You could possibly read up on Template:Cite web to improve some of your references, or you could use the Cite drop down menu at the top of your edit box. I think your next step is to address the readability of the article. Some of the wording is confusing and copy-editing may be necessary. In addition, your lead section is 6 paragraphs long; however, it should not be more than 4 paragraphs long. Ryan Vesey (talk) 05:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ryan! thnx for the input. have "cleaned it up" as much as i knew and also edited besides limiting it to 4 paras. please have a look. tks {Szolan (talk) 06:15, 26 June 2011 (UTC)}[reply]
This article will be receiving biased editing (and has already, such as the addition of “thief” to occupation) in a matter that is currently not settled at all. This article should receive a semi-protected status to avoid undo wars. Fuser55 (talk) 14:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fuser55 User Reignfall appears to be a biased editor (possibly the person the article is about, see their edit history) and is removing controversy section. WP editing guidelines do not prohibit this controversy section from existing if it's sourced correctly. I will restore said section when removed. 2001:56A:F430:1900:14A3:AF39:BCE6:3987 (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a [1] reddit link to a post concerning this page showcasing now reverted edits pushing a viewpoint benefiting the other party in the dispute. This is undue attention and should be another reason for protection. Fuser55 (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
deleting all signs of controversy, especially while she is currently knee deep in one, would seem to benefit one of the parties in the dispute as well though. This wiki page is now nothing more than a puff piece Gaskina12 (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, your reddit link doesn't show any bias at all and instead refers to the incident with terms like "accused" and "he alleges" Gaskina12 (talk) 18:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}