Talk:Sha Tin to Central Link/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Sha Tin to Central Link. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Requested move
Move: Sha_Tin_to_Central_Link_(MTR) → Sha_Tin_to_Central_Link
Rationale: The government has no final decision on the builder of this rail link. Misleading if the rail company name is in the title.
Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support - It will mislead readers. Xavier Fung 18:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
- Support - I agree with you, the article should be renamed after adding proposal of KCR. Also, the final decision of the government has not been announced yet. PoonKaMing 15:15, 5 April 2006 (HKT)
Discussion
- Add any additional comments
- The topic title mislead readers to think that it is a MTR project. Now the line is still a KCR project as Hong Kong government has granted them rights to build it. If it comes to the discussion of rumours, I will prefer a section in the passage to due with this but not changing the title like this. Xavier Fung 18:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
March 11 proposal
I made a new section for it, but since not a lot changed, maybe the new info should just be added to the kcr-mtr merger proposal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike2525 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Split Kwun Tong Extension?
Split Kwun Tong Line Extension? Should we move the Infobox bits to North-south Line? Pchenry2006mb-wiki (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Move request
Sha Tin to Central Link -> Shatin to Central Link Official sources (e.g. booklets, webpages) from MTR use Shatin instead of Sha Tin. KX675 =]Talkbox 09:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Cross platform
Will they realign the tracks at Yau Ma Tei so that passengers can go from Whampoa to Admiralty without walking up the stairs (or going to Prince Edward to change - an extra 4 stations)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.122.171 (talk) 14:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Update
Can somebody please update the opening paragraphs? They're a bit out of date. Wjfox2005 (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Approved
This poroject has been approved by the Executive Council, http://rthk.hk/rthk/news/elocal/news.htm?elocal&20120328&56&829243 and from the HK government http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201203/27/P201203270394.htm.