Talk:Serbia in the Balkan Wars

Serbia High‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Balkan / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force

Kosovo

	Serbia in the Balkan Wars is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.KosovoWikipedia:WikiProject KosovoTemplate:WikiProject KosovoKosovo articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fixes

It still needs to be fixed a bit, so i left the tags. In few days of editing, it will be great. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 14:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

I don't know the rules about merging articles, yet, but if two articles are merged maybe talk pages of the articles should be merged also?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please don't remove references from Dr Robert Elsie

Dr Elise is one of the leading researchers for albania, please don't remove references to his work. thanks, mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 11:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have brought this up here Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#http:.2F.2Fwww.albanianhistory.net.2F James Michael DuPont (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This test should not be removed

here is the text someone way trying to remove, it is sourced by a well respected researcher. Please do not just remove the refs and then remove the text. you need to actually look into this.

The number of victims in the Kosovo Vilayet under Serbian control in the first few months was estimated at about 25,000 people.
REF: http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts20_1/AH1913_6.html Archbishop Lazër Mjeda: Report on the Serb Invasion of Kosovo and Macedonia
The Serbian government has officially denied reports on war crimes. http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts20_1/AH1913_1.html Leo Freundlich: Albania's Golgotha

After this war, Kosovo was part of Kingdom of Serbia again.
http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts20_1/AH1913_2.html Robert Elsie, The Conference of London 1913.
These events have greatly contributed to the growth of the Serbian-Albanian conflict.

James Michael DuPont (talk) 11:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Book cited is also online

The book that is quoted on the webpage is also available on the webpage. http://www.elsie.de/pdf/B2002GatheringClouds.pdf The webpages from albanianhistory.net contain also the sources at the bottom. please do not remove the text here or references without reading the pages first. I just got copies of three books from the author for reference, I will update this article. please do NOT remove anything until we have a change to review it. thanks, mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 08:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NY_Times_Massacre_of_Albanians_1912.jpg) included? It clearly states : Say Hungarian Reports ; can we see those reports and say or a fact that it is not just propaganda considering Hungary-Serbia relations of that time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.149.168.112 (talk) 18:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There has been no active discussion on the TP for the tags on this article

One tag dates from 2010, the other from 2012 - the "drive by tagging" was not followed up - per our procedures - with opening a discussion on the Talk Page about the specific problems the editor(s) felt were there. I think both tags should go - they are over five years old! If they are still valid, then someone needs to begin the discussion of why . . . 104.169.26.177 (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article is destroyed

This article is destroyed. So many things are missing, so many things are not presented neutrally, and it is obvious that so many things were added and removed in the past, so we have this mess now. It should be rewritten from scratch in order to look like normal neutral encyclopedic article. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 17:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, as i already said, this article need a lot of corrections. References like http://www.albanianhistory.net and http://www.kosova.com are millenniums away from normal neutral source, especially for this article. Also, its highly POV and without proper explanation for entire history of this period and for this country. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 19:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would be better to use the actual books as RS's from albanianhistory.net, as the information on the site comes from several very well-researched tomes, such as Elise's KOSOVOA DOCUMENTARY HISTORY,From the Balkan Wars to World War II. There is no ' kosova dot com ' or any cache of it as far as I can find - so any references based on that need to be re-established from another source, or removed. 50.111.18.25 (talk) 20:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]