Talk:Senatus consultum Macedonianum

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merging into Roman litigation

I doubt this would be a good idea. A polished article on Roman litigation would be pretty long, and if the senatusconsultum Macedonianum were to be included, it would probably be good for the sake of consistancy to include the other Senate decisions too. That would probably make the article too long. There are also the various legis actiones, etc. Finally, I bet there is enough interesting information out there on the senatusconsultum Macedonianum to allow the article to stand on its own. modify 18:17, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Why was the article moved from its proper title of "Senatus consultum Macedonianum" to the current erroneous version of "Senatusconsultum Macedonianum"? There ought to be a space between "Senatus" and "consultum". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.51.93 (talk) 07:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nb from talk history: 19:22, 12 March 2012‎ Chesterx... moved page Talk:Senatusconsultum Macedonianum to Talk:Senatus consultum Macedonianum: proper name is senatus consultum , vide A.Dębiński, Roman Private Law. Compedium., Lexis Nexis, Warsaw 2008 Ifly6 (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

in potestate

We need to define in potestate. RJFJR (talk) 02:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]