Talk:Sembrong
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Sembrong be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
On 9 December 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Sembrong (federal constituency). The result of the discussion was Not moved. |
Requested move 9 December 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 05:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Sembrong → Sembrong (federal constituency) – As WP:PRECISE specify, Sembrong is precise enough to be unambiguous, but the qualifier should be added in Sembrong (federal constituency) with a redirect from Sembrong. Wee Hong (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, current title is unambiguous. 162 etc. (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- There is an article on mswiki about an agricultural area that may be the same or similar to the federal constituency but otherwise there doesn't seem to be other uses. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose unnecessary parenthetical disambiguation. BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.