Talk:Self

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Self. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Self at the Reference desk.

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Ethics / Mind High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Ethics
	Philosophy of mind

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Expansion needed

This article is far too cursory for such an important topic. I've added some possible sources under Self#Further reading; please feel free to add further sources and especially draw on these to expand the article. hgilbert (talk) 13:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proper use of vocabulary is somewhat neccessary for my thorough comorehension. Eagletreefeatherwood (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Questions on 'self'.

Re; Discussion ‘self’. Expansion needed 28/1/2011 I agree. The article is cursory, but there are many more important topics to be discussed before the ‘self’ can be fully and easily understood. I propose that you ask questions of interest to you relating to the ‘self’ and I shall try to answer them. KK (78.146.76.251 (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Why is it you in english but yo is I in Spanish. Please explain this. 192.173.6.125 (talk) 02:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Self doesn't exist and being a constructed self trapped in a physical form is slavery. 2D Is Better Than 3D (talk) 15:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Selves (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

selfhood > personhood

Does the awareness/sense of selfhood come before personhood?
We must extrapolate on that. The article is incomplete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4101:6100:5CC1:5832:312D:8673 (talk) 16:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Change lead sentence

Change from: The self is an individual person as the object of his or her own reflective consciousness.

Change to: Self is the experience of one's own knowledge and behavior.

...This change is unencumbered encyclopedic prose; the original is encumbered talk...go for the consensus.Arnlodg (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some rewriting of the article. I am totally open to changing the firs sentence, if we can find a good definition? Editor2020 (talk) 02:15, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The experience of being present...Arnlodg (talk) 02:05, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

...Rephrased lead sentences: "objective and reflexive, from and for", cited and referenced; Self is philosophy first, then we can apply it, itself, to any subject.Arnlodg (talk) 16:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arnlodg we have been here too many times before. Properly referenced proposals are always but not stream of consciousness stuff -----Snowded ^TALK 06:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sociology?

Why is 90% of the sociology section taken up with the work of two psychologists? And why is this discussion of their work so long? Retinalsummer (talk) 15:54, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]