Talk:Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Chris troutman (talk · contribs) 03:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
I'm deeply concerned that this article relies so heavily on one source. I'm not sure if that is a fatal defect. I'm going to ask for a second opinion. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- I haven't seen much English-language writing on this subject. This covers the major aspects discussed in the literature. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- I think images from the commons could be used, even if somewhat tangential. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Heavy reliance on a single source is permitted for GA. More sourcing will be required for A-level and FA review. While I would like to see images, there aren't any that are exactly applicable to the topic and therefore not per se necessary. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail: